Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Remarks on ascertainment.

W J Ewens¹, N C Shute

¹Department of Mathematics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Genetic Epidemiology

|January 1, 1989

Summary

Genetic Analysis Workshop (GAW) data may have varied ascertainment procedures. Incorrectly specifying these procedures can introduce biases, impacting the GAW5 analysis results.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Simulating the component counts of combinatorial structures.

Theoretical population biology·2018

Same author

RANDOM SAMPLING AND THE RATE OF GENE REPLACEMENT.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Same author

THE PROBABILITY OF FIXATION OF A MUTANT: THE TWO-LOCUS CASE.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Same author

A genetic model having complex linkage behaviour.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2014

Same author

Locating genes by linkage and association.

Theoretical population biology·2002

Same author

Significance testing for direct identity-by-descent mapping.

Annals of human genetics·2000

Area of Science:

Genetics
Statistical Genetics
Bioinformatics

Background:

Genetic Analysis Workshop (GAW) data are aggregated from diverse sources.
Each data source may employ distinct ascertainment procedures.

Observation:

Classical ascertainment models might not precisely reflect the procedures used in each GAW data source.
This discrepancy can lead to biases in genetic data analysis.

Findings:

Review of potential biases arising from misspecified ascertainment processes.
Discussion of the relevance of these biases specifically for the GAW5 data analysis.

Implications:

Highlights the critical need for accurate ascertainment modeling in genetic studies.
Emphasizes the importance of understanding data source specificities for robust genetic analysis.
Suggests potential adjustments or considerations for GAW5 data interpretation.