Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026
Author Spotlight: Overcoming Anti-VEGF Resistance Through Advanced Vascular Morphology Assessment in Choroidal Neovascularization
Published on: August 11, 2023
Comparison of Time to Retreatment and Visual Function Between Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Age-Related Macular
Maiko Inoue1, Shin Yamane1, Shimpei Sato1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Purpose:
To compare time to retreatment and visual function between patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with either intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) in routine clinical practice.
Design:
Retrospective, interventional comparative case series.
Participants:
A total of 200 eyes of 197 patients with neovascular AMD.
Methods:
A total of 99 patients in the IVR group and 101 patients in the IVA group who met the inclusion criteria with 12 months of follow-up were included in the present study. All patients received 3 consecutive monthly injections of 0.5 mg/0.05 mL ranibizumab or 2.0 mg/0.05 mL aflibercept as loading doses. Retreatment was allowed if evidence of clinical deterioration or the presence of intraretinal edema or subretinal fluid on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography examination performed at the 1-month follow-up was noted. The time to retreatment after the third injection during the loading phase to the first recurrence during the maintenance phase was compared between treatments using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Functional and anatomic outcomes were also compared between the IVR and IVA groups.
Results:
The median time to retreatment after the last induction dose was 5 months in both groups. The proportion of IVR patients who required injection retreatment was not significantly higher than that of IVA patients (67.7% and 63.4%, respectively, at the 12-month follow up; log-rank test, P = .554). In both groups, significant improvements in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) compared with preoperative visual acuity was observed over the 12-month follow-up period (P < .05 for both). Central foveal thickness (CFT) decreased from the baseline values in both groups during the follow-up period (P < .001 for both). Although there was a trend toward greater BCVA improvements in the IVA group, no significant differences in BCVA or CFT were observed between the treatment groups.
Conclusions:
Both IVR and IVA were well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy in improving the visual acuity in treatment-naïve patients with AMD. Despite a trend toward greater BCVA improvements in the IVA group, a similar injection burden was observed following the loading phases of both ranibizumab and aflibercept.
