Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

10:17
Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
Published on: October 5, 2017
9.4K
Diet Assessment Based on Rumen Contents: A Comparison between DNA Metabarcoding and Macroscopy
Ruth V Nichols1,2,3, Mikael Åkesson1, Petter Kjellander1
1Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
Plos One
|June 21, 2016
Summary
DNA metabarcoding offers a more precise and sensitive method for analyzing wild ungulate diets compared to traditional macroscopic analysis. This cost-effective technique enhances our understanding of ecology and evolution through improved diet composition assessment.
Area of Science:
- Ecology and evolutionary biology
- Wildlife biology
- Molecular ecology
Background:
- Accurate dietary analysis is crucial for understanding ecology and evolution, but traditional methods are time-consuming and have limitations.
- DNA metabarcoding is a faster, cheaper alternative for diet analysis, but its accuracy compared to classic methods needs empirical validation.
- Wild ungulate dietary studies often rely on macroscopic identification of rumen contents, which can be labor-intensive and less precise.
Purpose of the Study:
- To empirically compare the accuracy and effectiveness of DNA metabarcoding against macroscopic identification for analyzing the diet of wild ungulates.
- To evaluate the performance of DNA metabarcoding in terms of taxa identification, taxonomic precision, and niche overlap analysis.
- To assess the potential of DNA metabarcoding for quantitative diet composition analysis in wildlife.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of DNA metabarcoding and macroscopic identification techniques using rumen contents from roe deer and fallow deer.
- Analysis of identified taxa, taxonomic precision (genus/species level identification), and niche overlap using both methods.
- Correlation analysis between macroscopic quantity and DNA sequence counts to evaluate quantitative accuracy.
Main Results:
- Both DNA metabarcoding and macroscopic methods yielded comparable results, with some discrepancies in item identification between techniques.
- DNA metabarcoding identified a higher total number of taxa and demonstrated substantially higher taxonomic precision (90% to genus/species level) than macroscopy (75%).
- Niche overlap analyses showed similar conclusions with presence/absence data, but DNA metabarcoding tended to show higher overlap with sequence count data compared to macroscopic weight.
Conclusions:
- DNA metabarcoding provides a valuable, cost-efficient alternative for quantitatively assessing ungulate diet composition, offering enhanced taxonomic precision and sensitivity.
- The significant correlation between macroscopic quantity and DNA sequence counts supports the use of metabarcoding for quantifying plant matter in diets.
- Integrating DNA metabarcoding into wildlife dietary studies can significantly improve the understanding of ecological and evolutionary processes driven by food choices.

