Patient characteristics and risk factors of participants and non-participants in the NOR-COR study
John Munkhaugen1, Elise Sverre1, Kari Peersen2
1a Department of Medicine , Drammen Hospital , Drammen , Norway.
Insights
Non-participants in coronary heart disease (CHD) studies often have more risk factors like depression and diabetes. This suggests current prevention studies may overestimate risk factor control in CHD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) patient populations in clinical studies may not fully represent the general CHD patient demographic.
- Understanding differences between study participants and non-participants is crucial for accurate clinical research and effective public health strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare patient characteristics and coronary risk factors between participants and non-participants in a survey of CHD patients.
- To identify factors associated with non-participation in CHD clinical studies.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed data from hospital medical records of patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and/or revascularization.
- Compared characteristics and risk factors between study participants (n=1127) and non-participants (n=229) who declined consent.
Main Results:
- Non-participants exhibited higher prevalence of women (28% vs. 21%), ethnic minorities (6% vs. 3%), living alone (26% vs. 19%), depression (19% vs. 6%), anxiety (9% vs. 3%), hypertension (54% vs. 43%), and diabetes (24% vs. 17%).
- Significantly higher multi-adjusted odds ratios for non-participation were observed for Charlson comorbidity index (3.4) and depression (14.5).
Conclusions:
- Non-participants in CHD studies present with a greater burden of coronary risk factors, potentially leading to an overestimation of risk factor control in existing prevention studies.
- Patients with somatic comorbidity and depression are at higher risk of non-participation.
- Developing new strategies to address non-adherence is essential for improving secondary prevention in CHD.
Objectives:
We aim to compare patient characteristics and coronary risk factors among participants and non-participants in a survey of CHD patients.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study explored characteristics and risk factors in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and/or revascularization. Study data collected from hospital medical records were compared between participants (n = 1127, 83%) and non-participants (n = 229, 16%), who did not consent to participation in the clinical study.
Results:
Non-participants showed statistically higher prevalence of women (28% versus 21%), ethnic minorities (6% versus 3%), patients living alone (26% versus 19%), depression (19% versus 6%), anxiety (9% versus 3%), hypertension (54% versus 43%) and diabetes (24% versus 17%). Significantly higher multi-adjusted odds ratios were found for Charlson comorbidity index 3.4 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8, 4.3) and depression 14.5 (4.4, 121.5) in non-participants.
Conclusions:
Non-participants do have higher prevalence of important coronary risk factors compared to participants, and risk factor control may thus be overestimated in available prevention studies. Patients with somatic comorbidity and depression appear to be at particular risk of non-participation in the present study. New strategies accounting for the causes of nonadherence are important to improve secondary prevention in CHD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Longitudinal Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Longitudinal Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...


