Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Age range for inclusion affects ascertainment by birth defects registers
Catherine S Gibson1, Heather Scott2, Eric Haan3,4
1South Australian Birth Defects Register, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. catherine.gibson@sa.gov.au.
Insights
Most birth defects are diagnosed early, with 81.5% identified by age one. The South Australian Birth Defects Register (SABDR) data shows diagnosis timing varies significantly across defect types.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- The South Australian Birth Defects Register (SABDR) has recorded birth defect diagnosis dates since 2005.
- Understanding diagnosis timing is crucial for interpreting birth defect data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To document the age at diagnosis for major birth defect categories.
- To create a profile of when birth defects are diagnosed.
Main Methods:
- Extracted deidentified SABDR data for birth years 2005-2007.
- Categorized diagnosis dates (termination/stillbirth, neonatal, 1 month-5 years, unspecified).
- Grouped defects using the International Classification of Diseases Ninth edition-British Paediatric Association major diagnostic categories.
Main Results:
- 6419 defects in 3676 individuals; 98.6% had recorded diagnosis dates.
- 20.3% were terminations/stillbirths; 46.7% diagnosed neonatally.
- 81.5% diagnosed by age 1, with significant variation between diagnostic categories.
Conclusions:
- Birth defect registers should capture data from terminations, stillbirths, and live births up to age five.
- Diagnosis date patterns offer valuable insights for medical specialists and researchers.
- This study underscores the utility of comprehensive birth defect data collection.
Background:
The South Australian Birth Defects Register (SABDR) has collected the date of diagnosis of notified birth defects since the 2005 birth year cohort. This study aims to document the age at diagnosis for each of the main diagnostic categories of birth defects, to produce a profile of when defects are diagnosed.
Methods:
Deidentified data were extracted from the SABDR for birth years 2005 to 2007. Each birth defect was assigned to a mutually exclusive date of diagnosis category (termination/stillbirth; neonatal [birth-28 days]; 1 month-1 year; 1-2 years; 2-3 years; 3-4 years; 4-5 years; unspecified). Each defect was also grouped according to the International Classification of Diseases Ninth edition-British Paediatric Association major diagnostic categories (nervous, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, urogenital, musculoskeletal, chromosomal, metabolic, hematological/immune, other).
Results:
There were 6419 defects identified in 3676 individuals, and 98.6% of defects had a diagnosis date recorded. Terminations of pregnancy/stillbirths accounted for 20.3% of defects notified, and a further 46.7% of defects were diagnosed within the neonatal period. A total of 81.5% of defects were diagnosed by 1 year of age. An additional 17.2% of defects were diagnosed between the ages of 1 and 5 years. There were wide differences in age at diagnosis between the major diagnostic categories.
Conclusion:
This study highlights the value of birth defect registers collecting information about birth defects from terminations of pregnancy, stillbirths, and live births up to a child's fifth birthday. Reviewing diagnosis date provides insight into the pattern of diagnosis of different birth defects. This provides valuable information to medical specialists and researchers regarding the interpretation of information from birth defect data collections. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:761-766, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Teratogenicity
Pedigree Analysis
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Nondisjunction

