Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
Published on: May 12, 2023
Default "Gunel and Dickey" Bayes factors for contingency tables
Tahira Jamil1, Alexander Ly1, Richard D Morey2
1Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 129B, 1018, VZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract:
The analysis of R×C contingency tables usually features a test for independence between row and column counts. Throughout the social sciences, the adequacy of the independence hypothesis is generally evaluated by the outcome of a classical p-value null-hypothesis significance test. Unfortunately, however, the classical p-value comes with a number of well-documented drawbacks. Here we outline an alternative, Bayes factor method to quantify the evidence for and against the hypothesis of independence in R×C contingency tables. First we describe different sampling models for contingency tables and provide the corresponding default Bayes factors as originally developed by Gunel and Dickey (Biometrika, 61(3):545-557 (1974)). We then illustrate the properties and advantages of a Bayes factor analysis of contingency tables through simulations and practical examples. Computer code is available online and has been incorporated in the "BayesFactor" R package and the JASP program ( jasp-stats.org ).
Related Concept Videos
Probability Laws
Contingency Table
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Determination of Expected Frequency
Fisher's Exact Test

