Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

520
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
520
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

107
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
107
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment01:29

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

280
Product specifications define the acceptable quality of a pharmaceutical product by ensuring identity, purity, potency, and strength. These specifications serve as benchmarks during development, manufacturing, and post-approval quality control. Clinically relevant specifications are particularly important because they directly relate to a drug's safety and efficacy in clinical use.Dissolution studies are critical biopharmaceutic tools that link in vitro behavior to in vivo performance. They...
280
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

274.4K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
274.4K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to Mr. DiNardo's "Letter to the Editor: Comprehensive review of octocrylene toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products".

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same author

Nitrosamine Ames Data Review and Method Development: proceedings of a US FDA/HESI workshop.

Mutagenesis·2026
Same author

Comprehensive review of octocrylene toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same author

Retraction notice to "Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans" [Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 31 (2000) 117-165].

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025
Same author

Comprehensive review of ensulizole toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2025
Same author

Comprehensive review of avobenzone (butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane) toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Examining Behavioral Response Profiles in Larval Fish: Application to the Neuro-stimulant Caffeine
08:33

Experimental Protocol for Examining Behavioral Response Profiles in Larval Fish: Application to the Neuro-stimulant Caffeine

Published on: July 24, 2018

11.9K

GRAS determination scientific procedures and possible alternatives.

Gary M Williams1, Tetyana Kobets1, Michael J Iatropoulos1

  • 1Department of Pathology, New York Medical College, 40Sunshine Cottage Road, BSB # 413, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|June 22, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Food substances are Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) if scientific data or common use proves their safety. Evidence includes substance identity, metabolism, and toxicity studies for intended use.

Keywords:
Accelerated carcinogenicity bioassay(ACB)AlternativesCarcinogenicityGRAS determination scientific proceduresGenerally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)In Ovo assaySafetyScientific proceduresToxicity

More Related Videos

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.8K
Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

4.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Examining Behavioral Response Profiles in Larval Fish: Application to the Neuro-stimulant Caffeine
08:33

Experimental Protocol for Examining Behavioral Response Profiles in Larval Fish: Application to the Neuro-stimulant Caffeine

Published on: July 24, 2018

11.9K
High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.8K
Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

4.4K

Area of Science:

  • Food Science
  • Toxicology
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • The Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) designation is crucial for food substance approval.
  • GRAS determination relies on scientific procedures or evidence of common use in food.
  • Safety assessment requires comprehensive data on the substance and its toxicological profile.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the essential data requirements for GRAS determination.
  • To detail the toxicological data needed for safety assessment.
  • To explore alternative methodologies for enhancing the GRAS process.

Main Methods:

  • Review of regulatory guidelines for GRAS substances.
  • Analysis of pivotal data required for safety evaluation.
  • Identification of alternative scientific procedures for GRAS assessment.

Main Results:

  • GRAS determination necessitates data on substance identity, specifications, and ADME properties.
  • Comprehensive toxicological data, including genotoxicity, acute, subchronic, reproductive, developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity, are critical.
  • Alternative procedures can potentially streamline and improve the GRAS determination process.

Conclusions:

  • Robust scientific evidence, including toxicological data, is paramount for establishing GRAS status.
  • The GRAS framework ensures the safety of food substances under intended conditions of use.
  • Exploring alternative methods can enhance the efficiency and rigor of GRAS evaluations.