Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

CRISPR-Based Assay for Point-of-Care Pharmacogenetic CYP2C19 Genotyping.

ACS sensors·2026

Same author

BinaxNOW vs malaria: A diagnostic showdown: Design and implementation of a verification strategy across 4 academic hospitals in an area with low malaria prevalence.

American journal of clinical pathology·2025

Same author

Toward responsible AI governance: Balancing multi-stakeholder perspectives on AI in healthcare.

International journal of medical informatics·2025

Same author

Electronic tools to improve procalcitonin utilization.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE·2025

Same author

CRISPR-enabled point-of-care genotyping for APOL1 genetic risk assessment.

EMBO molecular medicine·2024

Same author

Real-World Biomarker Test Ordering Practices in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Interphysician Variation and Association With Clinical Outcomes.

JCO precision oncology·2024

Same journal

Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026

Same journal

CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026

Same journal

Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026

Same journal

Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026

Same journal

Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026

Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

Using Machine Learning to Predict Laboratory Test Results.

Yuan Luo¹, Peter Szolovits¹, Anand S Dighe²

¹From the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

|June 23, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning accurately predicts ferritin test results using other lab data, offering a new way to enhance clinical diagnosis and interpret patient information.

Keywords:

Clinical decision support Computational pathology Ferritin Imputation Machine learning Statistical diagnosis

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

Clinical diagnostics
Medical informatics
Machine learning in healthcare

Background:

Clinical diagnosis often integrates multiple laboratory tests, not just individual results.
Clinical decision support systems can improve laboratory diagnosis by integrating diverse data.
Ferritin is a key analyte, but its interpretation can be complex.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the potential of machine learning in predicting ferritin test results.
To assess if other laboratory tests and patient demographics can predict ferritin levels.
To evaluate the clinical utility of predicted ferritin values compared to measured ones.

Main Methods:

Extracted clinical laboratory data for ferritin testing.
Applied various machine learning algorithms to predict ferritin results from other test data.
Compared predicted ferritin values with measured results and reviewed clinical cases.

Main Results:

Patient demographics and other lab test results accurately predicted ferritin levels (AUC up to 0.97).
Predicted ferritin values showed potential to better reflect iron status in some cases.
Significant informational redundancy exists within patient laboratory test results.

Conclusions:

Machine learning can leverage existing laboratory data for enhanced diagnostic insights.
Predicted ferritin results may offer a complementary diagnostic tool.
Findings support developing novel clinical decision support for multianalyte interpretation.