Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Nursing Evaluation
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Critical Thinking II
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Clinical Data Standards: It's Now or Never for the Nursing Profession.
Mentors' and supervisors' perspectives regarding newly qualified nurses' practice in digitally enabled workplaces: A qualitative study.
Newly Qualified Canadian Nurses' Experiences With Digital Health in the Workplace: Comparative Qualitative Analysis.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
The Evaluation Imperative.
1Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Iterative evaluation is crucial for clinical information systems (CIS) and healthcare technologies. Integrating evaluation from the start ensures optimal efficiency, effectiveness, and impact.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Information Systems Management
- Healthcare Technology Assessment
Background:
- Widespread adoption of clinical information systems (CIS) and healthcare technologies is transforming service delivery.
- Project management often overlooks the critical role of iterative evaluation in technology implementation.
- Ensuring the success of healthcare IT requires a robust evaluation framework.
Purpose of the Study:
- To emphasize the imperative nature of iterative evaluation in the lifecycle of clinical information systems.
- To advocate for the initiation of evaluation processes at the earliest stages of system design and implementation.
- To highlight the necessity of multi-faceted evaluation methods for assessing technology impact.
Main Methods:
- Proposing that evaluation should be an integral part of project management for all clinical information systems.
Main Results:
- Evaluation, when initiated early and conducted iteratively, provides essential insights into system performance.
- A comprehensive evaluation framework helps identify areas for improvement in efficiency and effectiveness.
- Understanding human and financial impacts is key to successful technology integration.
Conclusions:
- Iterative evaluation must be a fundamental component of clinical information system project management.
- Early and continuous evaluation ensures that healthcare technologies meet organizational and user needs.
- Multi-faceted evaluation metrics are vital for maximizing the benefits of health IT investments.
