Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

12.1K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
12.1K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.8K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.8K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

61.9K
Overview
61.9K
Proofreading01:31

Proofreading

9.7K
Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore,  it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
9.7K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

19.4K
19.4K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.9K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introduction to the Special Issue on Iconicity and Sound Symbolism.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Americaยท2025
Same author

Effects of laryngeal manipulations on voice gender perception.

Interspeechยท2025
Same author

Biological, linguistic, and individual factors govern voice qualitya).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Americaยท2025
Same author

Information conveyed by voice qualitya).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Americaยท2024
Same author

Acoustic voice variation in spontaneous speech.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Americaยท2022
Same author

Speaker discrimination performance for "easy" versus "hard" voices in style-matched and -mismatched speech.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Americaยท2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

On Peer Review.

Jody Kreiman

    Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR
    |June 23, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Peer review can be viewed cynically as adversarial or optimistically as collaborative. Embracing a collaborative approach enhances scientific progress and publication quality.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
    04:50

    Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

    Published on: August 4, 2023

    1.7K
    Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
    08:27

    Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

    Published on: September 2, 2021

    4.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    1.3K
    Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
    04:50

    Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

    Published on: August 4, 2023

    1.7K
    Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
    08:27

    Evaluation of Motor Impairment in C. elegans Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

    Published on: September 2, 2021

    4.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific Publishing
    • Scholarly Communication
    • Research Integrity

    Background:

    • This work examines the dualistic nature of the peer review process in scientific publishing.
    • It explores both the potential negative aspects and the inherent benefits of scholarly peer review.

    Discussion:

    • A cynical view portrays peer review as an antagonistic system that stifles innovation and delays research.
    • Conversely, an optimistic perspective highlights peer review as a collaborative effort to advance human knowledge.

    Key Insights:

    • The author's experience suggests that idealists are more prevalent than cynics in the peer review landscape.
    • A collaborative mindset among editors, reviewers, and authors is crucial for maximizing the benefits of peer review.
    • Careful manuscript preparation and a collegial interpretation of feedback are essential author contributions.

    Outlook:

    • Fostering a culture of collaboration in peer review can significantly improve the quality of scientific publications.
    • Encouraging a shared commitment to high-quality research can elevate the overall scientific enterprise.
    • The future of scientific publishing relies on constructive engagement within the peer review system.