Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conformity01:20

Conformity

48.3K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.3K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.8K
Intelligence01:27

Intelligence

9.0K
The term "intelligence" is complex because it refers to both behavior and individuals, and its interpretation varies across cultures. European Americans tend to link intelligence with reasoning and cognitive skills, while in Kenya, it is tied to responsible participation in family and social life. In Uganda, intelligence is seen as the ability to know the right actions and carry them out effectively, while the Iatmul people of Papua New Guinea associate it with the capacity to remember...
9.0K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

31.1K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
31.1K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.6K
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

305
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
305

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Managing the Complexity-Coherence Trade-Off in Clinical Reasoning: A Two-Stage Graph Ontology Based on WHO International Classifications.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

What Do We Actually Measure? The Epistemic Limits of Surrogate Markers in Chronic Disease.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Addressing the How of Implementation: A Hermeneutic Exploration of Implementing Virtual Kidney Care in a Remote, Rural Health Region.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Communities of Practice to Develop a Nuanced Understanding of Advanced Generalist Medicine in Junior General Practitioners.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

The Insight Trap: Recursive Affective-Symbolic Loops and the Architecture of Chronicity.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Implicit Bias and Microaggressions in the Care of People With Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness: Bridging Medicine, Disability Studies, and Family Advocacy.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

15.0K

How common standards can diminish collective intelligence: a computational study.

Michael Morreau1, Aidan Lyon2

  • 1UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsoe, Norway.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|June 25, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Physician group decisions improve with diverse grading standards, not uniform ones. This study shows varied evaluation criteria enhance information accuracy and decision-making in medical practice.

Keywords:
collective intelligencecomputer modellingevaluationevidence

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

15.0K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Decision-Making
  • Computational Social Science
  • Epistemology

Background:

  • Effective medical decisions rely on timely, actionable information.
  • Group deliberation and standardized evaluations are key features in medical practice.
  • Understanding how group dynamics influence information processing is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of individual differences in grading standards on group epistemic performance.
  • To analyze the role of group deliberation and evaluation metrics in medical decision-making using computer simulations.
  • To determine if diversity in standards enhances or hinders group information discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Multi-agent computer simulation modeling groups of physicians.
  • Simulating the process of information gathering and decision-making within these groups.
  • Analyzing the effect of varying levels of homogeneity/diversity in grading standards.

Main Results:

  • Contrary to expectations, diversity in members' grading standards improved group epistemic performance.
  • Simulated groups with varied standards were more effective at discovering relevant facts for decision-making.
  • Adopting uniform standards sometimes led to poorer group decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Diversity in evaluation standards within medical groups can enhance, not hinder, accurate information processing.
  • Group deliberation combined with diverse grading standards promotes better-informed medical decisions.
  • Uniformity in standards may not always be optimal for complex decision-making environments.