Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

08:20
In Situ Soil Moisture Sensors in Undisturbed Soils
Published on: November 18, 2022
7.8K
Evaluating Soil Moisture Status Using an e-Nose
Andrzej Bieganowski1, Katarzyna Jaromin-Glen2, Łukasz Guz3
1Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doswiadczalna 4 Str., Lublin 20-290, Poland. a.bieganowski@ipan.lublin.pl.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 25, 2016
Summary
Electronic noses (e-noses) can distinguish soil moisture levels in various soil types. Volatile fingerprints change during drying but return to original states, indicating e-nose potential for soil monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Sensor Technology
- Environmental Monitoring
Background:
- Soil moisture is a critical factor influencing agricultural productivity and environmental processes.
- Accurate and efficient methods for monitoring soil moisture are essential for precision agriculture and hydrological studies.
- Traditional methods for soil moisture assessment can be labor-intensive and time-consuming.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the capability of an electronic nose (e-nose) to differentiate various soil moisture levels.
- To assess the dynamic changes in volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles of soils during drying cycles.
- To evaluate the influence of different soil types on e-nose sensor responses.
Main Methods:
- Ten different arable soil types were analyzed using an e-nose.
- Soil samples were tested in air-dry (AD) conditions, then moistened to field water capacity, and subsequently dried over 180 days.
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) were employed for data analysis.
Main Results:
- The study demonstrated that volatile fingerprints of soils change significantly during the drying process.
- E-nose analysis, coupled with PCA and ANN, successfully distinguished different soil moisture levels.
- The volatile fingerprints of soils at the end of the drying cycle were comparable to their initial air-dry states.
- Distinct soil types exhibited unique e-nose signals even at identical moisture levels.
Conclusions:
- Electronic noses show promise as a non-destructive tool for real-time soil moisture monitoring.
- The e-nose can detect subtle changes in soil's volatile emissions related to moisture content.
- Soil type is a significant factor affecting e-nose performance in moisture assessment, necessitating type-specific calibration.

