Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

13.3K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
13.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.3K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

14.2K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
14.2K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

544
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
544
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.9K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

692
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
692

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Guide to recent advances in difference-in-differences methodology for population health studies.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
Same author

Does increasing overall health expenditure reduce inequality in under 5 mortality rates between provinces in Indonesia?

Health policy and planning·2026
Same author

The impact of physical activity on psychological distress in young people: An analysis of longitudinal data from the Millennium Cohort Study using causal machine learning.

JCPP advances·2026
Same author

Defining delayed graft function in kidney transplantation: A scoping review of outcome reporting practices.

Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.)·2026
Same author

Surgery or radiotherapy for early-stage cancer study protocol for an emulated target trial of radical radiotherapy versus radical cystectomy, with either following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, for organ-confined muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

PERsonalised Medicine for Intensification of Treatment (PERMIT) in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a target trial emulation from routine data.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same journal

Estimating an intervention's effects on health care disparities within and between physician organizations: decomposing the effects of health system affiliation.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

Gaming the System: Evaluating Spillover in a Video Game Intervention for Advance Care Planning using Physician Social Networks.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

A causal framework for evaluating drivers of policy effect heterogeneity using difference-in-differences.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

Choosing an analytic approach: key study design considerations in state policy evaluation.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

The challenges of integrating diverse data sources: A case study in major depression.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

The impact of knowledge of hospitalization on mortality predictions.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Estimating causal effects: considering three alternatives to difference-in-differences estimation.

Stephen O'Neill1, Noémi Kreif1, Richard Grieve1

  • 1Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology
|June 25, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

When parallel trends do not hold, alternative methods to difference-in-differences (DiD) provide better treatment effect estimates. The lagged dependent variable (LDV) approach offers the most efficient and least biased results in these scenarios.

Keywords:
Difference-in-differencesMatchingPay-for-performancePolicy evaluationSynthetic control method

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.1K

Area of Science:

  • Econometrics
  • Health Services Research
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Difference-in-differences (DiD) estimators rely on the parallel trends assumption, which is often violated in real-world settings.
  • Evaluating interventions like hospital pay-for-performance schemes requires robust causal inference methods.
  • The best practice tariffs programme in England serves as a key case study for evaluating healthcare policy impacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of difference-in-differences (DiD) estimators with alternative methods under violations of the parallel trends assumption.
  • To investigate the efficacy of the synthetic control method, lagged dependent variable (LDV) regression, and matching on past outcomes.
  • To assess the impact of the best practice tariffs programme on hospital performance using various econometric approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Monte Carlo simulation study to assess estimator performance.
  • Analysis of a hospital pay-for-performance scheme using difference-in-differences (DiD).
  • Comparison of DiD with synthetic control, lagged dependent variable (LDV) regression, and matching on past outcomes.

Main Results:

  • DiD estimators yield unbiased results only when the parallel trends assumption is met.
  • Alternative methods (synthetic control, LDV, matching) provide less biased treatment effect estimates when parallel trends are violated.
  • The lagged dependent variable (LDV) approach demonstrated the most efficient and least biased performance among the alternatives.

Conclusions:

  • The parallel trends assumption in DiD is a significant limitation for evaluating many real-world interventions.
  • Alternative causal inference methods offer more reliable estimates when the parallel trends assumption is implausible.
  • The LDV approach is recommended for its superior performance in bias and efficiency when evaluating healthcare policies like pay-for-performance schemes.