Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

242
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
242
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

273
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
273
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

10.1K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
10.1K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.9K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

18.3K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
18.3K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.1K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Statistical methodologies for absolute and relative efficacy assessment based on single-arm trials: a scoping review.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Optimising clinical trial methods for complex regional pain syndrome: a methodological framework (OptiMeth-CRPS).

Pain reports·2025
Same author

Attrition and discontinuation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials: a meta-analysis.

Journal of neurology·2024
Same author

Living systematic review and comprehensive network meta-analysis of ALS clinical trials: study protocol.

BMJ open·2024
Same author

Do efficacy results obtained from randomized controlled trials translate to effectiveness data from observational studies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2024
Same author

Exploring the Effectiveness of Self-Management Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

697

Sequential designs with small samples: Evaluation and recommendations for normal responses.

Stavros Nikolakopoulos1, Kit Cb Roes1, Ingeborg van der Tweel1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|June 26, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sequential methods in clinical trials for rare diseases require adjustments. This study demonstrates the need for corrections to critical boundaries in small sample sizes to maintain accuracy and suggests optimal design strategies.

Keywords:
Clinical trialsoptimal designrare diseasessequential designsmall samples

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

697
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Rare Disease Research

Background:

  • Sequential monitoring methods are increasingly recommended for rare disease clinical trials due to reduced sample size requirements.
  • Existing sequential methods often rely on large-sample approximations, which can inflate Type I error rates in small patient populations typical of rare diseases.
  • Traditional clinical trial design paradigms may be unsuitable for rare diseases where patient availability is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of sequential designs with small to moderate sample sizes for normally distributed outcomes.
  • To demonstrate the necessity of simple corrections to critical boundaries for accurate sequential testing in rare disease trials.
  • To propose a method for selecting optimal sequential designs when a maximum sample size is a constraint.

Main Methods:

  • Operational characteristics of sequential designs were assessed using normally distributed outcomes.
  • Simulations or analyses were performed for very small to moderate sample sizes.
  • Corrections to critical boundaries were evaluated.
  • A method for optimal sequential design selection was developed considering maximum sample size and prior treatment effect beliefs.

Main Results:

  • Sequential methods relying on asymptotic assumptions can lead to inflated Type I error rates in small sample sizes.
  • Simple corrections to critical boundaries are necessary to maintain the desired Type I error probability.
  • The proposed method allows for the selection of an optimal sequential design under a maximum sample size constraint.

Conclusions:

  • Adjustments to sequential monitoring methods are crucial for rare disease clinical trials with limited patient numbers.
  • Correcting critical boundaries is essential for reliable results when using sequential methods in small populations.
  • The developed approach facilitates efficient clinical trial design in rare diseases by optimizing sequential strategies within sample size limitations.