Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

05:37
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
2.7K
Credible Intervals for Precision and Recall Based on a K-Fold Cross-Validated Beta Distribution
1School of Software, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, P.R.C. wangyu@sxu.edu.cn.
Neural Computation
|June 28, 2016
Summary
New credible intervals improve machine learning model evaluation. These K-fold cross-validated beta distribution intervals offer higher confidence and shorter lengths than traditional t-distribution methods for precision and recall.
Area of Science:
- Machine Learning
- Statistical Inference
- Information Retrieval
Background:
- Precision and recall are key metrics for evaluating machine learning algorithms, particularly in information retrieval.
- Traditional confidence intervals for precision and recall, often based on K-fold cross-validated t-distributions, can yield unreliable results due to low confidence levels.
- There is a need for robust credible intervals that provide high confidence and short lengths for accurate performance assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose novel posterior credible intervals for precision and recall using K-fold cross-validated beta distributions.
- To address the limitations of existing confidence intervals that exhibit inadequate confidence degrees and potentially liberal inference.
- To offer improved methods for reliable statistical inference of machine learning model performance.
Main Methods:
- Developed two types of credible intervals based on K-fold cross-validated beta posterior distributions.
- Method 1: Inferred a single beta posterior distribution from all K confusion matrices.
- Method 2: Averaged K individual beta posterior distributions, each derived from a single confusion matrix.
Main Results:
- The first proposed credible interval consistently achieved confidence degrees exceeding 95% in experiments.
- Both proposed credible intervals demonstrated shorter interval lengths compared to corrected K-fold cross-validated t-distribution intervals.
- The new credible intervals outperformed traditional t-distribution-based intervals in terms of confidence degree and interval length rankings across 27 experimental cases.
Conclusions:
- The proposed K-fold cross-validated beta distribution credible intervals offer a more reliable approach for precision and recall inference.
- The first credible interval method is particularly recommended for its high confidence levels and reliability.
- These novel methods provide a superior alternative to existing techniques for robust machine learning performance evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
3.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
3.5K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
10.3K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.3K
Confidence Intervals
11.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
A...
11.1K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
1.7K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Sensitivity is the...
1.7K
Accuracy and Precision
3.1K
3.1K
Accuracy and Precision
16.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate...
16.8K

