Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

22.1K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.1K
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

1
Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
1
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

38.5K
Overview
38.5K
Keystone Species01:39

Keystone Species

25.3K
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a...
25.3K
Methods to Assess Microbial Communities01:19

Methods to Assess Microbial Communities

2
Microbial communities, comprising bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotic microorganisms, inhabit diverse ecosystems and play crucial roles in environmental and biological processes. Their diversity is defined by three main parameters: species richness (the number of distinct species), species abundance (the relative quantity of each species), and species evenness (how uniformly individual species are distributed in various locations). These factors together shape the structure and ecological balance...
2
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

38.2K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
38.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure-Based Peptide Inhibitor Design of Amyloid-β Aggregation.

Frontiers in molecular neuroscience·2019
Same author

Modulation format identification and OSNR monitoring using density distributions in Stokes axes for digital coherent receivers.

Optics express·2019
Same author

Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcome Predictors in Stroke Patients with M2 Occlusion: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

World neurosurgery·2019
Same author

Predictive value of in-hospital white blood cell count in Chinese patients with triple-vessel coronary disease.

European journal of preventive cardiology·2019
Same author

Prolonged Sitting, Its Combination With Physical Inactivity and Incidence of Lung Cancer: Prospective Data From the HUNT Study.

Frontiers in oncology·2019
Same author

Prognostic Value of Plasma Big Endothelin-1 Level among Patients with Three-Vessel Disease: A Cohort Study.

Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis·2019
Same journal

Pollinator community composition and pollen resource use in calcareous grasslands under different landscape contexts across Europe.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same journal

A global comparison of structural properties across ecological network types: The role of connectance, degree distribution and sampling inconsistencies.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same journal

Native habitat affinities predict fish invasions with post-invasion habitat shifts.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same journal

Understanding mammal avoidance of human settlements.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same journal

Environmental factors associated with nesting habits and age shape the composition and connection between skin and uropygial gland microbiomes of birds.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same journal

Leukocyte profiles reveal sex and age differences in immune investment in a polygynous bat.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
10:17

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

9.4K

Predator identity influences metacommunity assembly.

Nicole K Johnston1, Zhichao Pu1, Lin Jiang1

  • 1School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

The Journal of Animal Ecology
|June 29, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predator type significantly impacts how ecological communities assemble. Generalist predators reduce diversity, while specialist predators, combined with dispersal, can increase it by altering community dynamics.

Keywords:
beta diversitydiet breadthmetacommunitypredationsource-sink dynamicsstochasticity

More Related Videos

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

14.1K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
10:17

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

9.4K
Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

14.1K
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Community Ecology
  • Metacommunity Dynamics

Background:

  • Predation is a key biotic factor shaping ecological communities.
  • The role of predation in metacommunity assembly remains incompletely understood.
  • Metacommunity assembly involves local interactions and regional processes like dispersal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally investigate how different predator types (generalist vs. specialist) influence protist metacommunity assembly.
  • To assess the interactive effects of predator identity, dispersal, and colonization history on community structure.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized protist microcosm metacommunities to simulate ecological interactions.
  • Manipulated predator identity (generalist and specialist), dispersal rates between local communities, and species colonization history.
  • Quantified changes in alpha diversity (within-community diversity) and beta diversity (between-community diversity).

Main Results:

  • Generalist predation led to decreased alpha diversity and increased beta diversity, regardless of dispersal.
  • Specialist predation, coupled with dispersal, generated source-sink dynamics, resulting in higher alpha diversity and lower beta diversity.
  • Predator diet breadth critically influences metacommunity structure and diversity patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Different predator types exert distinct influences on prey metacommunity assembly.
  • Predator diet breadth is a crucial factor to consider when studying the ecological structuring of metacommunities.
  • Understanding predator-prey interactions is essential for predicting community responses to environmental change.