Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Nile Tilapia Prefer Water Hyacinth as Structural Enrichment Regardless of Stocking Density.

Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS·2025

Same author

Fish welfare in farms: potential, knowledge gaps and other insights from the fair-fish database.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2024

Same author

Surveying the welfare of farmed fish species on a global scale through the fair-fish database.

Journal of fish biology·2024

Same author

Validation of a Questionnaire for Equine Personality Assessement.

Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS·2024

Same author

Individuality really matters for fish welfare.

The veterinary quarterly·2023

Same author

Equine Rolling Behavior: Thermoregulation Mechanism After Exercise and Substrate Preference.

Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

A history-based method to estimate animal preference.

Caroline Marques Maia¹, Gilson Luiz Volpato¹

¹Laboratory of Animal Physiology and Behaviour, Department of Physiology, Caunesp, Institute of Biosciences (IB), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.

Scientific Reports

|June 29, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new history-based method analyzes animal choice tests to determine preferences. This approach weighs recent choices more heavily, improving the accuracy of identifying preferred items for animal welfare.

More Related Videos

Fat Preference: A Novel Model of Eating Behavior in Rats

Fat Preference: A Novel Model of Eating Behavior in Rats

Published on: June 27, 2014

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Published on: November 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

Fat Preference: A Novel Model of Eating Behavior in Rats

Fat Preference: A Novel Model of Eating Behavior in Rats

Published on: June 27, 2014

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Published on: November 17, 2023

Area of Science:

Animal Behavior
Animal Welfare Science
Ethology
Fish Behavior

Background:

Improving animal welfare through preferred items is crucial.
Choice tests are commonly used to assess animal preferences.
The reliability of choice tests in accurately reflecting animal preferences is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and present a novel history-based method for analyzing choice test data.
To accurately discriminate between preferred and non-preferred items based on animal choices over time.
To quantify the strength of animal preferences for specific items.

Main Methods:

Developed a history-based analytical method for individual choice test data.
The method differentially weights choices based on their recency.
Applied the method to analyze color choices in Nile tilapia.

Main Results:

Introduced a preference index to identify preferred versus non-preferred items in successive multiple-choice tests.
Provided methods to detect the strength of an animal's preference for each item.
Successfully demonstrated the method's application in Nile tilapia color preference studies.

Conclusions:

The history-based method offers a more robust approach to determining animal preferences from choice tests.
This method enhances the accuracy of identifying preferred items, contributing to improved animal welfare strategies.
The findings are applicable to various species and preference assessment scenarios in animal research.