Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET
Published on: April 28, 2013
Differential gene expression pattern in biopsies with renal allograft pyelonephritis and allograft rejection
Steve Oghumu1, Uday Nori2, Anna Bracewell2
1Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Abstract:
Differentiating acute pyelonephritis (APN) from acute rejection (AR) in renal allograft biopsies can sometimes be difficult because of overlapping clinical and histologic features, lack of positive urine cultures,and variable response to antibiotics. We wanted to study differential gene expression between AR and APN using biopsy tissue. Thirty-three biopsies were analyzed using NanoString multiplex platform and PCR (6 transplant baseline biopsies, 8 AR, 15 APN [8 culture positive, 7 culture negative], and 4 native pyelonephritis [NP]). Additional 22 biopsies were tested by PCR to validate the results. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and IDO1 were the top differentially expressed genes, upregulated in AR. Lactoferrin (LTF) and CXCL1 were higher in APN and NP. No statistically significant difference in transcript levels was seen between culture-positive and culture-negative APN biopsies. Comparing the overall mRNA signature using Ingenuity pathway analysis, interferon-gamma emerged as the dominant upstream regulator in AR and allograft APN, but not in NP (which clustered separately). Our study suggests that chemokine pathways in graft APN may differ from NP and in fact resemble AR, due to a component of alloreactivity, resulting in variable response to antibiotic treatment. Therefore, cautious addition of steroids might help in resistant cases of graft APN.
Insights
Differentiating acute pyelonephritis (APN) from acute rejection (AR) in kidney transplants is challenging. Gene expression analysis reveals distinct pathways, suggesting alloreactivity in graft APN may necessitate steroid consideration.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunology
- Genomics
Background:
- Distinguishing acute pyelonephritis (APN) from acute rejection (AR) in renal allografts is clinically challenging due to overlapping features.
- Lack of positive urine cultures and inconsistent antibiotic responses complicate diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differential gene expression patterns between AR and APN in renal allograft biopsies.
- To identify molecular signatures that can aid in differentiating these conditions.
Main Methods:
- NanoString multiplex platform and PCR were used to analyze gene expression in 33 renal allograft biopsies (including AR, APN, and controls).
- Validation was performed on an additional 22 biopsies.
- Ingenuity pathway analysis was employed to identify upstream regulators.
Main Results:
- CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and IDO1 were significantly upregulated in AR.
- Lactoferrin (LTF) and CXCL1 were elevated in APN and native pyelonephritis (NP).
- Interferon-gamma was identified as a key upstream regulator in AR and allograft APN, but not in NP.
Conclusions:
- Gene expression profiles suggest that chemokine pathways in allograft APN may resemble AR due to alloreactivity, differing from NP.
- This molecular distinction may explain variable responses to antibiotics in graft APN.
- Consideration of steroids for antibiotic-resistant graft APN is proposed.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management

