Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic cardiac perforation caused by pacemaker and defibrillator leads
Christopher A Rajkumar1, Simon Claridge2, Tom Jackson2
1Department of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Insights
Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging method for diagnosing cardiac perforations from pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads. Transvenous lead extraction is a safe and effective treatment for these rare but serious complications.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Cardiac perforations from pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads are rare but life-threatening complications.
- Optimal diagnostic and management strategies for cardiac perforation remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the most effective imaging modality for diagnosing cardiac perforation.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different management strategies for cardiac perforation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients with cardiac perforation >24 hours post-implant (2011-2015).
- Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy for chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and computed tomography (CT).
- Examination of lead extraction methods and associated complications.
Main Results:
- Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy (92.9%) for cardiac perforation compared to TTE (62.7%) and chest radiography (61.1%).
- CT exhibited 100% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity in identifying perforations.
- Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) achieved 100% procedural success in 17 patients, with one patient undergoing a hybrid approach.
Conclusions:
- CT is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing cardiac perforation.
- Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is a safe, effective, and versatile intervention for managing cardiac perforations.
Aims:
Cardiac perforations caused by pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads are uncommon but potentially fatal events. The optimal approach to such cases is unclear. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal imaging modality and management strategy for cardiac perforation.
Methods And Results:
All patients presenting to a single institution with cardiac perforation >24 h since implant between 2011 and 2015 were identified retrospectively. Assessment of the diagnostic performance of pre-extraction chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and computed tomography (CT) was carried out by blinded review. The method of lead extraction and any associated complications were examined. Eighteen cases of cardiac perforation were identified from 426 lead extraction procedures. Sixteen patients had abnormal electrical parameters at device interrogation. In all cases, the perforating lead was an active fixation model, and in four cases, this was an ICD coil. The accuracy of CT imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac perforation was 92.9%, with sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 85.7%, respectively. This was superior to both TTE (accuracy 62.7%, sensitivity and specificity 41.2 and 84.2%, respectively) and chest radiography (accuracy 61.1%, sensitivity and specificity 27.7 and 94.4%, respectively). Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) was performed in 17 patients, and a hybrid surgical approach in 1 patient. Of those who underwent TLE, there was 100% complete procedural success as per Heart Rhythm Society definitions.
Conclusion:
In the setting of cardiac perforation, CT is the imaging modality of choice. Transvenous lead extraction can be recommended as a safe, efficacious, and versatile intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....


