Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

XCP-D: A robust pipeline for the post-processing of fMRI data.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Daily Stressor-Related Negative Mood and its Associations with Flourishing and Daily Curiosity.

Journal of happiness studies·2025
Same author

TRACKING THE TOPOLOGY OF NEURAL MANIFOLDS ACROSS POPULATIONS.

ArXiv·2025
Same author

Tracking the topology of neural manifolds across populations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Impact of white matter hyperintensities on structural connectivity and cognition in cognitively intact ADNI participants.

Neurobiology of aging·2024
Same author

Measuring neuronal avalanches to inform brain-computer interfaces.

iScience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks
10:07

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks

Published on: December 2, 2015

28.1K

Choosing Wavelet Methods, Filters, and Lengths for Functional Brain Network Construction.

Zitong Zhang1,2, Qawi K Telesford2, Chad Giusti2,3

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Plos One
|June 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing the right wavelet method and length is crucial for accurately analyzing brain activity from fMRI, EEG, and MEG data. Optimal wavelet parameters enhance the reliability and sensitivity of graph theory metrics for detecting neurological and psychiatric disorders.

More Related Videos

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Large-Scale Neural Dynamics Through HD-MEA Technology
09:44

Author Spotlight: Advancing Large-Scale Neural Dynamics Through HD-MEA Technology

Published on: March 8, 2024

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks
10:07

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks

Published on: December 2, 2015

28.1K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Large-Scale Neural Dynamics Through HD-MEA Technology
09:44

Author Spotlight: Advancing Large-Scale Neural Dynamics Through HD-MEA Technology

Published on: March 8, 2024

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Wavelet methods are standard for analyzing neurophysiological signals (fMRI, EEG, MEG).
  • These methods decompose signals into frequency bands to assess functional connectivity and construct brain networks.
  • Lack of clear guidelines for wavelet parameter selection (method, filter, length) hinders reproducible research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of wavelet method, filter type, and length on graph metrics derived from neuroimaging data.
  • To evaluate how these wavelet parameters affect the sensitivity in detecting differences between healthy and diseased states.
  • To determine the influence of wavelet parameters on classification accuracy for psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Main Methods:

  • Compared the Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform (MODWT) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT).
  • Evaluated different wavelet filter families (Daubechies Extremal Phase, Daubechies Least Asymmetric, Coiflet).
  • Systematically varied wavelet length from 2 to 24, analyzing effects on graph metrics and disease classification.

Main Results:

  • MODWT yielded more stable estimates compared to DWT.
  • Wavelet filter length had a more significant impact on graph metric values than filter type.
  • Wavelet length critically influenced the detection of health-disease differences and classification accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Wavelet method and length choices substantially affect the reliability and sensitivity of graph theory metrics in neuroimaging.
  • Reporting of wavelet parameters is essential for transparency in neuroimaging studies.
  • Optimizing wavelet parameters can improve biomarker discovery for psychiatric and neurological disorders.