Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

03:33
Author Spotlight: Advancing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor Treatment with Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Published on: September 27, 2024
1.5K
Single port laparoscopic liver surgery: A minireview.
Ilhan Karabicak1, Kagan Karabulut1
1Ilhan Karabicak, Kagan Karabulut, Department of General Surgery, Medical Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55000 Samsun, Turkey.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
|July 1, 2016
Summary
Single-port laparoscopic liver resections offer cosmetic benefits but face challenges in exposure and oncological outcomes. Further review is needed to establish its role in liver surgery.
Area of Science:
- Minimally invasive surgery
- Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery
- Surgical oncology
Background:
- The trend towards "scarless" incisions favors techniques like single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS).
- SPLS offers cosmetic advantages with minimal invasiveness, typically using a single umbilical entry point.
- Interest in scarless liver resections lags behind other surgical fields due to surgeon reluctance and technical challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the literature on single-port laparoscopic liver resections (SPL-LR).
- To describe the history, indications, contraindications, and ideal patient profiles for SPL-LR.
- To evaluate the technical difficulties, advantages, disadvantages, and oncological concerns associated with SPL-LR.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of published studies on single-port laparoscopic liver resections.
- Analysis of historical development, clinical applications, and surgical outcomes.
- Examination of surgeon-reported challenges and patient selection criteria.
Main Results:
- SPL-LR adoption is slower than other scarless surgeries due to limited exposure and surgeon apprehension.
- Concerns exist regarding oncological outcomes for SPL-LR in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer.
- Technical challenges and the learning curve for instruments in narrow incisions are significant hurdles.
Conclusions:
- SPL-LR presents unique challenges, particularly regarding oncological safety and technical execution.
- Further research and standardized techniques are necessary to overcome current limitations.
- The future of SPL-LR depends on addressing concerns about oncological outcomes and improving surgical proficiency.

