Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.2K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.2K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

598
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
598

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The vicarious nature of hippocampal theta sequences.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Just how goal-directed are hippocampal theta sweeps, anyway?

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Coordinated Representational Drift Across the Mouse Cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Hippocampal representations differentiate reactive and anticipatory responses during foraging under threat.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Individual differences in decision-making shape how mesolimbic dopamine regulates choice confidence and change-of-mind.

Nature neuroscience·2025
Same author

Opposing, multiplexed information in lateral and ventral orbitofrontal cortex guides sequential foraging decisions in rats.

Neuron·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.1K

Rats value time differently on equivalent foraging and delay-discounting tasks.

Evan C Carter1, A David Redish2

  • 1Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|July 1, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Rats waited longer for rewards in foraging tasks than in delay-discounting tasks, even when reward rates were equal. Current intertemporal choice theories need revision to account for this behavioral difference.

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

16.1K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral economics
  • Animal cognition
  • Decision-making

Background:

  • Organisms must make decisions with consequences varying over time.
  • Intertemporal choice theories include delay-discounting and foraging models.
  • These models predict decision-making based on reward value and rate maximization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare rat behavior on equivalent delay-discounting and foraging tasks.
  • To test the adequacy of existing intertemporal choice models.
  • To identify factors influencing decision-making under temporal constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Rats performed a 2-option delay-discounting task.
  • Rats performed a stay/go foraging task with equivalent reward rates and demands.
  • A suite of intertemporal choice models was applied to behavioral data.

Main Results:

  • Rats exhibited significantly longer waiting times on the foraging task compared to the delay-discounting task.
  • Choice performance was less optimal in terms of total reward on the foraging task.
  • Existing models failed to fully explain the observed behavioral differences.

Conclusions:

  • Factors previously considered irrelevant significantly impact intertemporal choice.
  • Current general theories of intertemporal choice are inadequate.
  • A novel model incorporating interacting decision-making systems is needed.