Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

809
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
809
Emotional Expression01:26

Emotional Expression

1.2K
Emotional expression encompasses how individuals convey their emotions through verbal communication and non-verbal cues. These non-verbal actions include facial expressions, body language, and physical gestures, such as frowning or smiling. Among these, facial expressions play a crucial role in emotional expression and are understood universally, indicating a biological basis for how humans communicate emotions.
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...
1.2K
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

10.3K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
10.3K
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion01:20

Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion

2.2K
Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer proposed the two-factor theory of emotion, which emphasizes the interplay between physiological arousal and cognitive labeling in forming emotional experiences. This theory suggests that emotions are not simply a result of physiological responses but rather a combination of these responses and the individual's cognitive interpretation of them.
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...
2.2K
Labeling Emotion01:20

Labeling Emotion

883
Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...
883

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Popularizing Wine Tasting Evaluation: An Adaptation of Mouthfeel Terminology.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Personality predicts internalizing symptoms and quality of life in police cadets: a comparison of artificial intelligence and parametric approaches.

Health & justice·2025
Same author

Misperception of non-Happy Facial Features: Overshadowing and Priming by a Smiling Mouth.

The Journal of general psychology·2025
Same author

A smile hampers encoding and memory for non-happy eyes in a face: temporal dynamics and importance of initial fixation.

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

Conflicts between priming and episodic retrieval: a question of fluency?

Psychological research·2024
Same author

Control over emotional facial expressions: Evidence from facial EMG and ERPs in a Stroop-like task.

Biological psychology·2023
Same journal

Interactive effects of age and mindfulness on emotion regulation flexibility: Evidence from a daily diary study.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Childhood threat exposure and poor emotional awareness predict neural correlates of emotion regulation in adolescent girls.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Intensity, desirability, and attainability: Predictors of effort in emotion regulation among healthy and depressed individuals.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Effort shapes empathy: Distinct aftereffects of cognitive and physical exertion on pain empathy.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

An unequal exchange: A within-person examination of conversation role on intra- and interpersonal outcomes of co-ruminative conversations.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

The interdependence of emotion regulation in romantic couples: A longitudinal dyadic analysis of six strategies.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

14.7K

Recognition thresholds for static and dynamic emotional faces.

Manuel G Calvo1, Pedro Avero1, Andrés Fernández-Martín2

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Universidad de La Laguna.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
|July 1, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Recognizing basic facial emotions like happiness and fear requires minimal intensity. Dynamic expressions are recognized faster and more accurately than static ones, with varying thresholds for each emotion.

More Related Videos

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
05:51

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: May 15, 2016

9.5K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

14.7K
Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury
05:51

Exploring the Use of Isolated Expressions and Film Clips to Evaluate Emotion Recognition by People with Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: May 15, 2016

9.5K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.1K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Facial expressions are crucial for non-verbal communication.
  • Understanding the minimum intensity for emotion recognition is key to deciphering subtle social cues.
  • Previous research has explored emotion recognition, but thresholds for varying intensities remain an area of interest.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the minimum expressive intensity needed for above-chance recognition of six basic emotions (happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, fear, surprise).
  • To compare recognition thresholds for static versus dynamic facial expressions.
  • To investigate potential reasons for differential recognition thresholds across emotions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized graphics morphing software to create facial stimuli with varying emotional intensities from neutral faces.
  • Presented static and dynamic facial stimuli (photographs and short videos) in a 1-second categorization task.
  • Measured sensitivity (A') to establish recognition thresholds for each basic emotion.

Main Results:

  • All six basic emotions were recognized above chance, even at low intensities.
  • Recognition thresholds varied: happiness (20%), sadness/surprise/anger/disgust (40%), and fear (50%).
  • Dynamic expressions were recognized more accurately and faster than static ones, with equivalent thresholds and confusion patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Facial emotion recognition is possible at low expressive intensities, with significant variations across emotions.
  • Dynamic facial expressions offer advantages in recognition speed and accuracy over static ones.
  • The physical salience of happy expressions may contribute to their lower recognition threshold.