[A comparison of cyclists' time records according to altitude and materials used]

The purpose of this study was to re-assess the energy cost of track cycling in order (a) to compare the one-hour world records at sea-level and altitude with classical bicycles or with modern bicycles including aerodynamic components, and (b) to estimate the optimal altitude to set a new one-hour world record. Energy cost of track cycling with a classical or aerodynamic bicycle was estimated according to the equation developed by di Prampero et al. (1979) using data from Davies (1980) for the rolling resistance coefficient and from Gross et al. (1983) for the aerodynamic resistance coefficient for each type of bicycle. When compared to the classical track-bicycle, and to the bicycle studied by di Prampero et al. (1979), the aerodynamic track-bicycle reduces the resistance coefficient by 11.7 and 16.9% respectively. According to these estimations the cyclists sustain 87-95% of maximal aerobic power over one hour, which is a likely value for a 60 min exercise period for top-level athletes. When the reduction of air density and of maximal aerobic power with altitude are taken into account, equivalences between performances achieved at different altitudes and with the two types of track-bicycles, can be computed. The best overall performance appears to be the current one-hour record at sea-level using an aerodynamic bicycle (Moser: 50.644 km.h-1). This performance is equivalent to 53.5 km.h-1 in Mexico City (2230 m), 54.4 km.h-1 in La Paz (3417 m) and 54.5 km.h-1 at 3843 m (472 mmHg), which would be the optimal altitude to set the record.