Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Negative results in phase III trials of complex interventions: cause for concern or just good science?
Mike J Crawford1, Kirsten Barnicot2, Sue Patterson2
1Mike J. Crawford, FRCPsych, Kirsten Barnicot, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College, London, UK; Sue Patterson, PhD, Metro North Mental Health, Queensland, Australia; Christian Gold, PhD, GAMUT, The Grieg Academy Music Therapy Research Centre, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway m.crawford@imperial.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Not all interventions that show promise in exploratory trials will be supported in phase III studies. But the high failure rate in recent trials of complex mental health interventions is a concern. Proper consideration of trial processes and greater use of adaptive trial designs could ensure better use of available resources.
Insights
Many complex mental health interventions fail in late-stage trials. Improving trial design and using adaptive methods can optimize resource use and increase success rates for these crucial interventions.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Mental Health Research
- Intervention Science
Background:
- Exploratory trials often show promise for interventions, but subsequent phase III studies frequently fail to replicate these findings.
- A high failure rate in recent phase III trials for complex mental health interventions is a significant concern within the field.
Discussion:
- The transition from early-stage promise to late-stage validation is a critical bottleneck for complex interventions.
- Investigating the reasons behind high attrition rates in clinical trials is essential for improving future research.
- The inherent complexity of mental health interventions may contribute to difficulties in demonstrating efficacy in large-scale trials.
Key Insights:
- Not all promising exploratory trial results translate to successful phase III outcomes.
- The current rate of failure in complex mental health intervention trials necessitates a re-evaluation of research methodologies.
- Adaptive trial designs offer a potential solution to enhance efficiency and success rates.
Outlook:
- Future research should prioritize the careful consideration of trial processes to mitigate failure.
- Increased adoption of adaptive trial designs in mental health research could lead to more efficient resource allocation.
- Implementing adaptive strategies may improve the reliability and success of complex intervention validation.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Blinding
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
