Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

A Novel Vertebral Stabilization Method for Producing Contusive Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: January 5, 2015
Stabilization of the Craniovertebral Junction with Clivus Plate Constructs: Biomechanical Comparison with
Wei Ji1, Jie Tong2, Zhiping Huang1
1Department of Spinal Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Background:
Ventral defect caused by resection of the lesions involving the upper cervical spine commonly has been reconstructed with a fabricated mesh cage. Recently, a clival screw and plate fitted to the osseous anatomy of the craniovertebral junction was developed for this pathologic status.
Objective:
To evaluate the stability a clivus plate system fixation (CPSF) for the craniovertebral junction and compare it with a conventional fashioned mesh cage fixation (FMCF).
Methods:
Seven human fresh cadaveric specimens (occiput [Oc], atlas [C1], axis [C2], third cervical vertebra [C3], fourth cervical vertebra [C4]) were tested with intact and destabilization-reconstruction conditions. FMCF and CPSF were applied randomly to the clivus to the C3 segment combined with posterior occipitocervical fixation applied from the occiput to C4 segment, respectively. Specimens were subjected to a pure moment of 1.5 Nm in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. The range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) from the occiput to C3 were calculated and compared between two anterior fixations.
Results:
Motions were reduced significantly in all directions following FMCF and CPSF fixations when compared with the intact. The CPSF resulted in smaller ROM in lateral bending (0.3° vs. 0.6°, P = 0.015), axial rotation (0.6° vs. 1.2°, P = 0.023) and flexion (0.1° vs. 0.3°, P = 0.019), but similar ROM in extension (0.2° vs. 0.4°, P = 0.273) when compared with the FMCF. NZs with the CPSF were 0.1° in flexion-extension, 0.1° in lateral bending and 0.2° in axial rotation, respectively, and similar to NZs with the FMCF.
Conclusions:
The clivus plate system fixation is biomechanically superior to the conventional fashioned mesh cage fixation in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation, but equavalent in extension.
More Related Videos
07:06Surgical Technique for the Implantation of a Biomimetic Artificial Intervertebral Disc in a Goat Animal Model
Published on: October 10, 2025
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Articulations of the Vertebral Column
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Overview of the Skull
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...