Is a second look necessary in multiple and/or large Ta tumors?

Sıtkı Ün1, Hakan Türk, Mustafa Karabıçak

  • 1Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Research and Training Hospital, Department of Urology, Izmir. sitki@doctor.com.

Abstract

Insights

A second look transurethral resection (TUR) in patients with multiple or large bladder tumors improves early detection of residual disease. This follow-up procedure aids in more accurate risk classification for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Surgical Pathology

Background:

  • Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is common at diagnosis.
  • Transurethral resection (TUR) is the standard treatment for NMIBC.
  • Accurate risk stratification is crucial for effective NMIBC management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of a "second look" TUR for NMIBC.
  • To assess the impact of early follow-up TUR on detecting residual tumors.
  • To determine if this approach improves risk classification for multiple or large NMIBC.

Main Methods:

  • 156 patients with primary, multiple, and/or >3 cm NMIBC tumors were studied.
  • Patients were categorized into three groups: Ta, T1 without second TUR, and T1 with second TUR.
  • Macroscopic tumor recurrence rates were compared at 3-month cystoscopy.

Main Results:

  • Macroscopic tumor detection rates at 3 months were significantly higher in the Ta (46.7%) and T1 without second TUR (30%) groups compared to the T1 with second TUR group (7.8%).
  • The p-value was 0.001, indicating statistical significance.
  • A second look TUR demonstrated a lower rate of residual tumor detection.

Conclusions:

  • Early "second look" transurethral resection is beneficial for patients with multiple or large NMIBC.
  • This strategy aids in the detection of residual tumors.
  • It enhances the accuracy of risk classification for NMIBC patients.

Related Concept Videos