A critical review on the translational journey of cardioprotective therapies!
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 6, 2016
Xavier Rossello1, Derek M Yellon2
1The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
The failure to translate novel cardioprotective therapies tested in pre-clinical studies into the clinical setting for patient benefit can be attributed to a number of factors at different stages of the research process. This review focuses on the evidences and the gaps with regard to the translational journey of cardioprotective interventions. Gaps are classified into 3 main groups: 1) those related to pre-clinical studies, 2) those associated with the validation of infarct size as a good surrogate and 3) those based on design and interpretation of randomized clinical trials on cardioprotection. Addressing these gaps might increase the chances to successfully translate cardioprotective therapies into improving both post-STEMI heart failure and cardiovascular death rates.
Insights
Translating cardioprotective therapies to patients faces challenges in pre-clinical studies, surrogate validation, and clinical trial design. Addressing these gaps is crucial for improving outcomes after myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Translational Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Novel cardioprotective therapies often fail to translate from pre-clinical research to clinical practice.
- This failure impacts patient outcomes, particularly in managing post-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) heart failure and cardiovascular death rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence and identify critical gaps in the translational pathway of cardioprotective interventions.
- To highlight areas for improvement to enhance the successful clinical application of these therapies.
Main Methods:
- Literature review focusing on the translational journey of cardioprotective therapies.
- Classification of identified gaps into three main categories: pre-clinical studies, surrogate validation, and clinical trial design.
Main Results:
- Gaps exist in pre-clinical study methodologies and validation processes.
- The utility of infarct size as a reliable surrogate endpoint requires further validation.
- Challenges are present in the design and interpretation of randomized clinical trials for cardioprotection.
Conclusions:
- Addressing identified gaps in research and clinical trial design is essential for successful translation.
- Improving the translational success of cardioprotective therapies can significantly reduce post-STEMI heart failure and cardiovascular mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

