Juvenile Polyps in Denmark From 1995 to 2014

Anne Marie Jelsig1, Lilian Bomme Ousager, Klaus Brusgaard

  • 11 Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark 2 Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark 3 Department of Surgery A, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Insights

Juvenile polyps are rare, primarily affecting adults, and usually appear as single growths. A small percentage of patients have juvenile polyposis syndrome, requiring ongoing monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Colorectal Surgery

Background:

  • Juvenile polyps are the most common type of polyp in children but are rare overall.
  • Their prevalence and incidence in adults are largely unknown.
  • Typically, juvenile polyps have no malignant potential unless associated with juvenile polyposis syndrome.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the demographics of juvenile polyps in Denmark over a 20-year period (1995-2015).
  • To report on the occurrence, anatomical location, and recurrence of these polyps in the general population.
  • To provide insights into the epidemiology of juvenile polyps in both pediatric and adult populations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the nationwide Danish Pathology Data Bank.
  • Analyzed records of 1772 patients diagnosed with juvenile polyps between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2014.
  • Collected data on patient sex, age, polyp number, recurrence, and localization.

Main Results:

  • Approximately 75% of juvenile polyps were found in adults, and 25% in children.
  • Most patients (96%) had a single juvenile polyp without recurrence.
  • 1% met criteria for juvenile polyposis syndrome; 5% had multiple polyps (2-5). Estimated incidence is 1:45,000 to 1:65,000.

Conclusions:

  • Juvenile polyps are uncommon, predominantly occurring in adults as solitary lesions.
  • A subset of patients present with juvenile polyposis syndrome, necessitating regular follow-up.
  • Potential for miscoding in the register and limited data on recurrence and procedures were noted limitations.
Abstract