Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Intracranial Pharmacotherapy and Pain Assays in Rodents
Published on: April 9, 2019
Randomized Trial of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine for Abscess Incision and Drainage
Daniel B Fenster1, Peter S Dayan, John Babineau
1From the Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Insights
Intranasal fentanyl effectively reduced pain and distress in children undergoing abscess incision and drainage (I&D). This study found intranasal fentanyl to be noninferior, and possibly superior, to intravenous morphine for pediatric abscess I&D pain management.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Pain Management
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Abscess incision and drainage (I&D) is a painful procedure for children.
- Intranasal (IN) fentanyl is a known analgesic but its efficacy for abscess I&D pain has not been studied.
- Intravenous (IV) morphine is a common analgesic for such procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the analgesic efficacy of IN fentanyl with IV morphine for abscess I&D in children.
- To evaluate pain and distress reduction during pediatric abscess I&D.
- To assess patient and parental satisfaction with analgesia.
Main Methods:
- A randomized noninferiority trial was conducted in children aged 4 to 18 years.
- Participants received either IN fentanyl (2 μg/kg) or IV morphine (0.1 mg/kg).
- The primary outcome was the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R), with secondary outcomes including self-reported pain and treatment failure.
Main Results:
- IN fentanyl showed a statistically significant reduction in OSBD-R scores compared to IV morphine.
- Patients receiving IN fentanyl reported less pain post-procedure.
- Treatment failure occurred in 40% of IV morphine patients, compared to none in the IN fentanyl group. Patient and parental satisfaction favored IN fentanyl.
Conclusions:
- IN fentanyl is noninferior and potentially superior to IV morphine for managing pain and distress during abscess I&D in children.
- IN fentanyl offers a promising alternative analgesic for pediatric procedural pain.
- Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to confirm these findings.
Objectives:
Abscess incision and drainage (I&D) are painful and distressing procedures in children. Intranasal (IN) fentanyl is an effective analgesic for reducing symptomatic pain associated with fractures and burns but has not been studied for reducing procedural pain during abscess I&D. Our objective was to compare the analgesic efficacy of IN fentanyl with intravenous (IV) morphine for abscess I&D in children.
Methods:
We performed a randomized noninferiority trial in children aged 4 to 18 years undergoing abscess I&D in a pediatric emergency department. Patients received IN fentanyl (2 μg/kg; maximum, 100 μg) or IV morphine (0.1 mg/kg; maximum, 8 mg). The primary outcome, determined independently by blinded assessors, was the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R). The prestated margin of noninferiority (Δ) was 1.80. Secondary outcomes included self-reported pain, treatment failure, and patient and parental satisfaction.
Results:
We enrolled 20 children (median age, 15.4 years), 10 in each group. The difference between total OSBD-R scores was -13.45 (95% confidence interval, -24.24 to -2.67), favoring IN fentanyl.There was less self-reported pain in patients who received IN fentanyl immediately after the procedure. Four patients (40%) receiving IV morphine had treatment failures and required moderate sedation or had the procedure terminated. More patients who received IN fentanyl were satisfied with the analgesic administered compared with those who received IV morphine.
Conclusions:
In a small sample of children aged 4 to 18 years undergoing abscess I&D, IN fentanyl was noninferior, and potentially superior, to IV morphine for reducing procedural pain and distress.
More Related Videos
07:23Assessment of Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia and Analgesic Tolerance in Mice Using Thermal and Mechanical Nociceptive Modalities
Published on: July 29, 2014
05:44Novel Methods for Intranasal Administration Under Inhalation Anesthesia to Evaluate Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery
Published on: November 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...