Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026
Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
Published on: March 23, 2019
Validation study of arm positions for evaluation of global spinal balance in EOS imaging
Kanichiro Kaneko1, Yoichi Aota2,3, Tatsuhiro Sekiya1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama City University, Fukuura 3-9, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama City, Kanagawa Prefecture, 236-0004, Japan.
Background:
The sagittal vertical axis (SVA) is important in the evaluation of spinal sagittal balance. Although the "fists-on-clavicles" (FOC) position has been widely used in radiographic examinations, it does not define shoulder flexion in detail. Meanwhile, in EOS imaging, the "hands-on-cheeks" (HOC) position is widely used but has not been well investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative usefulness of FOC and HOC in investigating SVA.
Materials And Methods:
Mean SVA was measured by EOS imaging using standing lateral radiographs of 34 volunteers in four different positions: relaxed (RLX), shoulder flexion at 90° with FOC (FOC90), elbows touching the trunk with FOC (FOCET), and HOC.
Results:
The mean SVA was 2.0 ± 2.1 cm in RLX; -1.4 ± 3.2 cm in FOC90; -0.5 ± 3.0 cm in FOCET; and -0.2 ± 2.9 cm in HOC. The negative shift from RLX was significantly greater in FOC90 than in FOCET (-3.4 ± 2.2 vs -2.5 ± 2.4 cm; p = 0.0182). The negative shift from RLX in HOC was almost equal to that in FOCET; the difference was 0.3 cm (-2.2 ± 2.2 vs -2.5 ± 2.4 cm; p = 0.2560).
Conclusion:
FOC90 showed a negative SVA shift in comparison with FOCET. The difference in the mean SVA between HOC and FOCET was 0.3 cm, a clinically small difference.
