Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Identifying workflow disruptions in the cardiovascular operating room
T N Cohen1, J S Cabrera1, O D Sisk1
1Department of Human Factors, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA.
Insights
Operating room flow disruptions vary significantly by role. Circulating nurses face more interruptions, while anaesthetists and perfusionists encounter more layout issues, requiring role-specific solutions.
Area of Science:
- Medical Human Factors
- Surgical Workflow Analysis
- Operating Room Management
Background:
- Operating room (OR) workflow is critical for patient safety and efficiency.
- Disruptions to surgical flow can negatively impact team performance and outcomes.
- Understanding role-specific challenges is essential for effective OR management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the frequency and types of flow disruptions experienced by anaesthetists, circulating nurses, and perfusionists in cardiac surgery.
- To identify significant differences in disruption patterns among these key surgical team members.
- To inform the development of targeted interventions for improving OR workflow.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 15 cardiac surgical cases.
- Data coding using a human factors taxonomy to categorize 878 identified disruptions.
- Statistical comparison of disruption frequencies and resolution times across disciplines.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in disruption frequency were observed between anaesthetists, circulating nurses, and perfusionists.
- Circulating nurses experienced higher rates of coordination disruptions and interruptions.
- Anaesthetists and perfusionists reported more layout-related issues.
- Disruption resolution times varied significantly among the disciplines.
Conclusions:
- A one-size-fits-all approach to managing OR disruptions is inadequate.
- Interventions must be tailored to the specific challenges faced by individual roles within the surgical team.
- Addressing role-specific disruptions can optimize operating room flow and enhance team performance.
Abstract:
The objectives of this study were to identify the frequency and nature of flow disruptions in the operating room with respect to three cardiac surgical team members: anaesthetists; circulating nurses; and perfusionists. Data collected from 15 cases and coded using a human factors taxonomy identified 878 disruptions. Significant differences were identified in frequency relative to discipline type. Circulating nurses experienced more coordination disruptions (χ(2) (2, N = 110) = 7.136, p < 0.028) and interruptions (χ(2) (2, N = 427) = 29.743, p = 0.001) than anaesthetists and perfusionists, whereas anaesthetists and perfusionists experienced more layout issues than circulating nurses (χ(2) (2, N = 153) = 48.558, p = 0.001). Time to resolve disruptions also varied among disciplines (λ (12, 878) = 5.186, p = 0.000). Although most investigations take a one-size fits all approach in addressing disruptions to flow, this study demonstrates that targeted interventions must focus on differences with respect to individual role.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...

