Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

The statistical analysis of concurrent detection ratings.

T D Wickens, L A Olzak

    Perception & Psychophysics
    |June 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Categorical data analysis.

    Annual review of psychology·2004
    Same author

    Spatial phase sensitivity of mechanisms mediating discrimination of small orientation differences.

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2001
    Same author

    When further learning fails: stability and change following repeated presentation of text.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2000
    Same author

    Paradigm shifts: new techniques to answer new questions.

    Perception·2000
    Same author

    False memories and statistical decision theory: comment on Miller and Wolford (1999) and Roediger and McDermott (1999)

    Psychological review·2000
    Same author

    Multiple gain control processes in contrast-contrast phenomena.

    Vision research·2000
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    This study introduces a new analysis for concurrent detection tasks, improving the assessment of sensory signal interactions. The method distinguishes various cognitive and sensory effects for more accurate interaction analysis.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Psychophysics
    • Sensory Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Concurrent detection tasks assess interactions between two sensory signals.
    • Classical bivariate signal-detection analysis has limitations in differentiating sensory interactions from cognitive components and lacks testing procedures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present an alternative analysis for concurrent detection tasks based on contingency tables.
    • To differentiate and test six classes of effects in sensory signal processing.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a contingency table analysis of sensory ratings from concurrent detection tasks.
    • Developed a method to distinguish and test simple response bias, signal detection, signal interference, correlation, bivariate biases, and higher-order association.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The proposed contingency table analysis allows for the distinction and testing of six distinct effect classes.
    • This method overcomes limitations of classical bivariate signal-detection analysis in differentiating sensory and cognitive components.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel contingency table analysis provides a more comprehensive and testable framework for understanding sensory signal interactions.
    • This approach enhances the assessment of cognitive and sensory processes in concurrent detection paradigms.