Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.5K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.3K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.3K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.9K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.1K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.1K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.9K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biochemical profiling and symptomatology of androgen deficiency in males with cluster headache: A prospective case-control study.

Headache·2026
Same author

Early Prediction Model for Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Placental and Neonatal Risk Factors.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

The role of hormonal markers in predicting reproductive lifespan in girls with Turner syndrome-a retrospective study.

Journal of the Endocrine Society·2026
Same author

An observational diagnostic accuracy study comparing the urine dipstick with a consensus-based reference standard for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in older adults.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Ex vivo T2*-weighted MRI and quantitative susceptibility mapping reflect spatial iron accumulation observed on histology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Neurobiology of disease·2026
Same author

Tolerability and efficacy of full-body head-up tilt sleeping in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis.

Joanna IntHout1, John P A Ioannidis2, Maroeska M Rovers1

  • 1Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

BMJ Open
|July 14, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Prediction intervals in meta-analyses offer a clearer understanding of treatment effect variability than traditional measures. Routine reporting of prediction intervals enhances the interpretation of clinical trial results and future patient outcomes.

Keywords:
Clinical trialCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsHeterogeneityMeta-analysisPrediction intervalRandom effects

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Evidence Synthesis

Background:

  • Meta-analyses evaluate treatment effect variability using measures like tau-squared (τ²) or I-squared (I²).
  • These measures present challenges in straightforward clinical interpretation.
  • Prediction intervals offer a more intuitive way to estimate the range of true effects across studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the advantages of routinely reporting prediction intervals in meta-analyses.
  • To illustrate how prediction intervals aid in understanding the uncertainty of intervention effects.
  • To evaluate the implications of using prediction intervals for result interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Selected 95% prediction intervals for meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2009-2013).
  • Included meta-analyses with dichotomous (n=2009) and continuous (n=1254) outcomes.
  • Generated prediction intervals to assess their utility in interpreting heterogeneity.

Main Results:

  • In 72.4% of significant meta-analyses with heterogeneity, prediction intervals indicated null or opposite effects.
  • For 20.3% of these meta-analyses, prediction intervals showed effects completely opposite to the point estimate.
  • Demonstrated utility in calculating the probability of negative effects in new trials and improving power calculations.

Conclusions:

  • Prediction intervals reflect treatment effect variations across settings, predicting future patient outcomes.
  • Routine reporting of prediction intervals is recommended for more informative meta-analysis inferences.
  • Prediction intervals enhance clinical interpretation by providing expected ranges of true effects.