Predictors and Prognostic Impact of Progressive Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Patients With Advanced Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Multimodality Study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

An Image Guided Transapical Mitral Valve Leaflet Puncture Model of Controlled Volume Overload from Mitral Regurgitation in the Rat
Published on: May 19, 2020
Deborah H Kwon1, Kenya Kusunose2, Nancy A Obuchowski2
1From the Department of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute (D.H.K., K.K., Z.B.P., M.Y.D., S.D.F., B.P.G.), Imaging Institute (D.H.K., M.Y.D., S.D.F.), and Quantitative Health Sciences (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, Japan (K.K.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh/University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA (J.L.C.); Heart and Vascular Institute, Northwestern University Hospital, Chicago, IL (J.D.T.). kwond@ccf.org.
Background:
Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with poor outcomes. It is unknown what factors contribute to progression of IMR and how progressive IMR affects outcomes. We sought to determine imaging predictors of IMR progression and to determine if progressive IMR is an independent predictor of survival in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Methods And Results:
Consecutive advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiograms at baseline with echocardiographic follow-up were studied. Cardiac magnetic resonance was used to assess left ventricular volumes, infarct size, and mitral valve geometry. The effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) was calculated from the proximal isovelocity surface area by echocardiography. Repeated measures mixed effects and Cox proportional hazards regression models were built to identify predictors of IMR progression and survival. We evaluated 336 patients (age, 62±11 years) over a median follow-up time of 54 months: 154 patients were subsequently revascularized, and 182 patients were medically treated. Ninety-eight patients (29%) demonstrated an increase in EROA values of ≥0.1 cm(2). There were 87 adverse events (death or transplant). On multivariable analysis, infarct size (P<0.001), progression in IMR (P=0.008), age (P=0.003), and baseline EROA (P=0.010) were independently associated with adverse events. Independent predictors of IMR progression were as follows: baseline EROA (P<0.001), left ventricular end-systolic volume index (P=0.014), and total scar (P=0.036).
Conclusions:
IMR frequently increases in severity, and progression is independently associated with adverse left ventricular remodeling and infarct size, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Furthermore, IMR progression is a powerful independent predictor of adverse events, even after controlling for the severity of IMR at baseline.
More Related Videos
08:31A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction