Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.4K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.4K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

7.2K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.2K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.3K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

846
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
846
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

4.2K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
4.2K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

787
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
787

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to Validation of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire Short Form (CATQ-SF). Comprehensive Psychiatry 135 (2024) Nov:135:152525.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2026
Same author

The shared variance amongst the measures of individual differences and trait EI: a meta-meta-analytic comparison.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Predicting Leadership Status Through Trait Emotional Intelligence and Cognitive Ability.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Evaluating The Predictive Reliability of Neural Networks in Psychological Research With Random Datasets.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024
Same author

Validation of the camouflaging autistic traits questionnaire short form (CATQ-SF).

Comprehensive psychiatry·2024
Same author

Monte Carlo simulation with confusion matrix paradigm - A sample of internal consistency indices.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same journal

Modeling and analysis of forward and inverse kinematics for a flexible Stewart platform.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare utilization amongst people living with sickle cell disease in the United States: A scoping review.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Enhancing data completeness in time series: Imputation strategies for missing data using significant periodically correlated components.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Key targets and mechanisms by which gut microbiota-derived metabolites regulate Alzheimer's disease through the immune - inflammatory pathway: Based on network pharmacology and molecular docking.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Grid-tied Transformer-less Boost Switched Capacitor Topology (TLBSCT) for PV applications.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

The load-velocity profiles and exercise-specific velocity zones for seven commonly used weightlifting exercises.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Drive: Theory and Construct Validation.

Alex B Siegling1, K V Petrides1

  • 1London Psychometric Laboratory, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Plos One
|July 14, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed and validated two new measures for assessing drive, a key aspect of individual differences. These reliable and valid tools offer a promising way to explore this neglected area of personality assessment.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Individual Differences
  • Personality Assessment

Background:

  • Drive is a critical, yet under-researched, aspect of individual differences.
  • Existing measures may not adequately capture the multifaceted nature of drive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explicate the theory of drive.
  • To develop and validate two novel measures of drive.
  • To establish the reliability and validity of these drive assessment tools.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of drive facets from a comprehensive corpus of human attributes (Study 1).
  • Operationalization using the International Personality Item Pool (Drive:IPIP) and factor analysis across three samples (Study 2).
  • Assessment of convergent, discriminant, concurrent, and incremental validity, along with cross-informant reliability (Study 3).

Main Results:

  • A representative set of drive facets was identified.
  • A robust three-factor model of drive was confirmed.
  • Both multi-item and short-form drive measures demonstrated reliability and validity.

Conclusions:

  • The developed Drive:IPIP and its short form are reliable and valid measures.
  • These instruments provide a foundation for future research into the neglected domain of drive.
  • The findings support the utility of these measures in non-cognitive assessment.