Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

14.9K
Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
14.9K
What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

81.1K
Overview
81.1K
Catalytically Perfect Enzymes01:07

Catalytically Perfect Enzymes

5.3K
The theory of catalytically perfect enzymes was first proposed by W.J. Albery and J. R. Knowles in 1976. These enzymes catalyze biochemical reactions at high-speed. Their catalytic efficiency values range from 108-109 M-1s-1. These enzymes are also called 'diffusion-controlled' as the only rate-limiting step in the catalysis is that of the substrate diffusion into the active site. Examples include triose phosphate isomerase, fumarase, and superoxide dismutase.
 
Most enzymes...
5.3K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

8.3K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
8.3K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.8K
3.8K
Proteins: From Genes to Degradation02:11

Proteins: From Genes to Degradation

14.8K
Within a biological system, the DNA encodes the RNA, and the nucleotide sequence in the RNA further defines the amino acid sequence in the protein. This is referred to as “The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology” - a term coined by Francis Crick.  Central dogma is a firm principle in biology that defines the flow of genetic information within any life form. The two fundamental steps in central dogma are - transcription and translation.
Transcription is the synthesis of RNA...
14.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expanding the toolkit of LacI/GalR chimeras.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Amino acid substitutions at rheostat positions in the Na<sup>+</sup>/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide substrate channel have pleiotropic effects.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2025
Same author

Dissecting the effects of single amino acid substitutions in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2025
Same author

Substitutions at rheostat position 52 of LacI have long-range effects on the LacI conformational landscape.

Biophysical chemistry·2025
Same author

Identification of positions in human aldolase a that are neutral for apparent K<sub>M</sub>.

Archives of biochemistry and biophysics·2024
Same author

Rheostatic contributions to protein stability can obscure a position's functional role.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2024
Same journal

Heterogeneous binding of SARS-CoV2 fusion peptide on complex cellular membranes enhances its fusogenicity.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Tau protein differentially affects Piezo1 and Kir2.1 channels in brain capillary endothelial cells.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Emergent Intercellular Junction Stability during Cyclic Tissue Loading.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Enhanced-Sampling Simulations Reveal Distinct Intermediates in SARS-CoV-2 FSE Pseudoknot Interconversion.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Structure-based simulations of the full Flock House virus capsid reveal pathways and energetics of an infection-critical peptide externalization event.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the Peripheral Surface Information Entropy from Conformational Ensembles of Globular Protein-Peptide Complexes.

Biophysical journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering &#8211; Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
05:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.4K

Using Evolution to Guide Protein Engineering: The Devil IS in the Details.

Liskin Swint-Kruse1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

Biophysical Journal
|July 14, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Protein engineers struggle to precisely alter protein functions. Evolutionary data reveals complexities, highlighting the need for new protein design strategies to match natural protein performance.

More Related Videos

A New Screening Method for the Directed Evolution of Thermostable Bacteriolytic Enzymes
13:30

A New Screening Method for the Directed Evolution of Thermostable Bacteriolytic Enzymes

Published on: November 7, 2012

18.6K
In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
09:16

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering &#8211; Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
05:08

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation

Published on: January 12, 2024

2.4K
A New Screening Method for the Directed Evolution of Thermostable Bacteriolytic Enzymes
13:30

A New Screening Method for the Directed Evolution of Thermostable Bacteriolytic Enzymes

Published on: November 7, 2012

18.6K
In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity
09:16

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Protein Engineering
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Protein engineering aims to create novel protein functions by modifying existing proteins.
  • Domain recombination allows transfer of protein folds and gross functions, but fine-tuning specific functions remains difficult.
  • Evolutionary sequence analysis identifies nonconserved amino acids for targeted mutations to optimize protein function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review complexities in using evolutionary data for predictable protein function fine-tuning.
  • To identify challenges hindering the replication of natural protein functional performance in engineered proteins.
  • To propose new goals for future protein design studies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of evolutionary and experimental studies on protein function.
  • Analysis of complexities in identifying functionally important amino acid positions.
  • Examination of epistasis and the contribution of multiple amino acids to protein function.

Main Results:

  • Predictably fine-tuning protein function (e.g., ligand affinity, specificity, catalysis) is challenging.
  • Evolutionary approaches often fail to engineer proteins matching natural functional performance.
  • Complexities include defining amino acid importance, diverse evolutionary patterns, mapping changes to function, nonconventional mutations, epistasis, and widespread amino acid contribution.

Conclusions:

  • Significant hurdles exist in predictably engineering protein function using evolutionary insights.
  • A deeper understanding of protein biophysics and evolutionary constraints is necessary.
  • Future research should focus on addressing these complexities to advance protein design capabilities.