Effect of Interventional Program on the Utilization of PACS in Point-of-Care Ultrasound

While the implementation of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) has revolutionized the field of radiology, there has been considerably less utilization of PACS by emergency physicians with point-of-care ultrasound. Benefits of PACS archival of images include improved quality assurance, preservation of image quality, and accessibility of images. Our objective was to determine if a simple interventional program would influence the utilization of PACS in point-of-care ultrasound. A before-after study was conducted in an urban, academic emergency department. Data was collected during a 4-week baseline period, a 12-week intervention period, and a 12-week post-intervention period. The percentage of ultrasound studies archived to PACS was recorded during each week of the study. Interventions were designed to encourage the utilization of PACS. A significant increase in the mean percentage of PACS studies was found between the baseline and intervention period (59.4 %; 95 % CI: 34.76-84.08 %; p < 0.001). Mean percentage of PACS studies at 1-month (74.3 %), 2-month (61.0 %), and 3-month (74.8 %) post-intervention periods remained elevated and were all significantly increased compared to baseline values (p < 0.001). Mean percentages of PACS studies at 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month post-intervention periods were not statistically significant from the intervention period (p = 0.977, p = 0.849, p = 0.967, respectively). A simple interventional program for emergency physicians can significantly increase and sustain the utilization of PACS for point-of-care ultrasound.