Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

521
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
521
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

27.0K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
27.0K
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

362
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
362
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

307
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
307
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.9K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

621
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
621

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Morality is more than agreement: Negotiating justice, rights, and social inequalities.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Beyond What Is Said: Generic Language in Parent-Child Conversations and Children's Racial Bias.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Chinese Singaporean Children's Expectations About Peer Group Norms in the Context of Wealth and Ethnicity.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Unique Challenges Faced by Global Developmental Scientists During Peer-Review: A Survey Study.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Children's and adolescents' reasoning about distributive fairness and educational inequalities.

International journal of behavioral development·2026
Same author

Adolescents' perceptions of social mobility: Reasoning about intergroup friendship and marriage in Nepal.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K

Rectifying social inequalities in a resource allocation task.

Laura Elenbaas1, Michael T Rizzo1, Shelby Cooley2

  • 1University of Maryland, United States.

Cognition
|July 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Children learn to correct social inequalities with age. Older children prioritize fairness and equal resource access, rectifying disparities regardless of racial group, by balancing moral and social concerns.

Keywords:
FairnessIngroup biasIntergroup attitudesMoral developmentResource allocationSocial cognition

More Related Videos

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.8K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.8K
Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.6K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Moral Development

Background:

  • Children's understanding of social inequalities and resource allocation is crucial for developing fairness.
  • Previous research indicates ingroup favoritism can influence children's decisions.
  • Investigating how children address racial disparities in resource distribution is important.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine if and how children rectify social inequalities in a resource allocation task.
  • To understand developmental changes in children's responses to racial resource disparities.
  • To explore the interplay of moral reasoning and social group concerns in promoting fairness.

Main Methods:

  • 185 African-American and European-American children (5-6 and 10-11 years old) participated.
  • Participants observed an unequal distribution of school supplies between racial outgroups and ingroups.
  • Assessments included judgments of inequality, resource allocation, evaluation of strategies, and reasoning.

Main Results:

  • Younger children exhibited ingroup favoritism, with responses varying based on the disadvantaged group's race.
  • Older children increasingly recognized the importance of equal access and correcting disparities.
  • Older children judged inequalities negatively, allocated more resources to disadvantaged groups, and supported fairness regardless of race.

Conclusions:

  • Age-related development influences children's ability to rectify social inequalities.
  • Balancing moral considerations with social group awareness enables children to ensure fair resource access.
  • Children's capacity to address racial disparities improves with age, promoting equitable outcomes.