Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
Published on: November 10, 2010
Dominance dynamics of competition between intrinsic and extrinsic grouping cues
Dolores Luna1, Cristina Villalba-García2, Pedro R Montoro1
1Departamento de Psicología Básica I, UNED, Spain.
Abstract:
In the present study we examined the dominance dynamics of perceptual grouping cues. We used a paradigm in which participants selectively attended to perceptual groups based on several grouping cues in different blocks of trials. In each block, single and competing grouping cues were presented under different exposure durations (50, 150 or 350ms). Using this procedure, intrinsic vs. intrinsic cues (i.e. proximity and shape similarity) were compared in Experiment 1; extrinsic vs. extrinsic cues (i.e. common region and connectedness) in Experiment 2; and intrinsic vs. extrinsic cues (i.e. common region and shape similarity) in Experiment 3. The results showed that in Experiment 1, no dominance of any grouping cue was found: shape similarity and proximity grouping cues showed similar reaction times (RTs) and interference effects. In contrast, in Experiments 2 and 3, common region dominated processing: (i) RTs to common region were shorter than those to connectedness (Exp. 2) or shape similarity (Exp. 3); and (ii) when the grouping cues competed, common region interfered with connectedness (Exp. 2) and shape similarity (Exp. 3) more than vice versa. The results showed that the exposure duration of stimuli only affected the connectedness grouping cue. An important result of our experiments indicates that when two grouping cues compete, both the non-attended intrinsic cue in Experiment 1, and the non-dominant extrinsic cue in Experiments 2 and 3, are still perceived and they are not completely lost.
Related Concept Videos
Competition
In- and Out-Groups
Impact of Groups on Groups
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Robbers Cave
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

