Abdominal stab wounds in Lagos: A review of fifty cases
Adedapo Olumide Osinowo1, Olugbenga Oluseyi Olusoji2, Adedoyin Adekunle Adesanya1
1Department of Surgery, General Surgery Unit, College of Medicine, University of Lagos and Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria.
Background:
The optimum management of patients with abdominal stab wounds (ASWs) is yet to be fully elucidated.
Aims And Objectives:
To evaluate the pattern of injury, treatment offered and outcome in patients with ASWs seen at our tertiary hospital.
Patients And Methods:
This was a retrospective descriptive study of patients who sustained ASWs seen from January 2011 to December 2015. Information obtained from case notes were analysed on a personal computer using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
Fifty patients who sustained ASWs were included in the study. Forty-four (88%) were males, mean age was 27 years and 50% were between the ages of 21 and 30 years. The wounding weapon in patients was the knife in 26 (52%) and broken bottle in 14 (28%). Our patients presented at the hospital about 3 h after abdominal stabs and surgical intervention time was uniformly prolonged. Forty-eight (96%) patients had emergency laparotomy, whereas two (4%) patients with omental evisceration were treated using the policy of selective non-operative management. The commonly injured organs were stomach (22.9%), small bowel (20.8%), omentum (18.8%), colon (18.8%) and liver (14.6%). The negative laparotomy rate was 31.3%. The knife was a more lethal weapon than broken bottle in our patients (P<0.05). Seven (14%) patients suffered serious post-operative complications and two (4%) died.
Conclusion:
The high therapeutic laparotomy rates observed in our patients who had generalised peritonitis, evisceration and shock, support the fact that these findings should be indications for immediate laparotomy.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:


