Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Model-Based Electroencephalography Phenotyping Uncovers Distinct Neurocomputational Mechanisms Underlying Learning Impairments Across Psychopathologies.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2026
Same author

Working memory updating for free items and for item-to-context bindings: When attention is enough and when gating is needed.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Age-related changes in the susceptibility to visual illusions of size.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

The voluntary utilization of visual working memory.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Computational mechanisms underlying latent value updating of unchosen actions.

Science advances·2023
Same author

The BTPI: An online battery for measuring susceptibility to visual illusions.

Journal of vision·2023
Same journal

Shared and Culture-Specific Brain Networks for Emotional Facial Discrimination: Evidence from Predictive Modeling.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Experiences of Autistic and Non-Autistic Aphantasics: A Qualitative Study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

5.3K

Decomposing the n-back task: An individual differences study using the reference-back paradigm.

Rachel Rac-Lubashevsky1, Yoav Kessler2

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.

Neuropsychologia
|July 19, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in working memory (WM) tasks like n-back are influenced by controlling WM contents. The study found gate closing and intrusion impact 2-back performance, while gate opening and WM updating affect 1-back.

Keywords:
Cognitive controlGatingIndividual differencesReference-backWorking memory updatingn-back

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.8K
Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
10:43

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity

Published on: July 1, 2014

15.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

5.3K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.8K
Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
10:43

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity

Published on: July 1, 2014

15.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Working memory (WM) involves maintenance and updating functions, potentially regulated by a gating mechanism.
  • The n-back task is a common measure of WM updating, but its relationship with other WM control processes is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct contributions of WM maintenance, updating, and gating mechanisms to individual differences in n-back task performance.
  • To differentiate the roles of gate opening and gate closing in WM control using the reference-back paradigm.

Main Methods:

  • Employed the reference-back paradigm, which includes reference (matching + updating) and comparison (matching + maintenance) trials.
  • Administered 2-choice RT, 1-back, 2-back, and reference-back tasks to 88 participants.
  • Utilized multiple regression to analyze individual differences in 1-back and 2-back performance based on gating and updating components.

Main Results:

  • 1-back performance was primarily predicted by gate opening and WM updating.
  • 2-back performance was mainly influenced by gate closing and proactive interference (intrusion).
  • Results suggest n-back performance reflects both updating and WM content control, with the latter driving individual differences.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences in n-back performance are significantly explained by the ability to control WM contents, not just updating capacity.
  • The findings highlight the importance of gating mechanisms in WM and provide a more nuanced understanding of the n-back task.