Best Practices for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Infants With Robin Sequence: A Clinical Consensus Report

Corstiaan C Breugem1, Kelly N Evans2, Christian F Poets3

  • 1Department of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

JAMA Pediatrics
|July 19, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Robin sequence (RS) diagnosis lacks consensus. This report provides best practices for evaluating infants with RS, aiming to standardize care for micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Otolaryngology

Background:

  • Robin sequence (RS) is a congenital condition involving micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction.
  • Current diagnostic and evaluation standards for infants with RS are inconsistent.
  • An international multidisciplinary group convened to address this diagnostic gap.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish consensus-derived best practices for diagnosing and evaluating infants with Robin sequence.
  • To provide a foundational framework for standardizing management protocols for RS.
  • To improve clinical decision-making in the care of infants with RS.

Main Methods:

  • A literature review was conducted to synthesize existing evidence.
  • Expert opinions from a multidisciplinary consensus group were gathered.
  • A clinical consensus report was generated based on the review and expert input.

Main Results:

  • Robin sequence diagnosis can be complex due to variability in presentation and subjective assessment of micrognathia.
  • Key features include micrognathia, glossoptosis, and potential for multilevel upper airway obstruction, often exacerbated during sleep.
  • Feeding difficulties, particularly with cleft palate, are common and influence management.
  • Initial assessment of respiratory distress and consideration of sleep studies are crucial.

Conclusions:

  • This consensus report offers agreed-upon recommendations for the initial evaluation and clinical descriptors for RS.
  • Uniform definitions and standardized assessments are encouraged for researchers and clinicians.
  • Further prospective studies and validated assessments are necessary to build an evidence base for RS care standards.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos