Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

454
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
454
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

521
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
521
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

367
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
367

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

An approach to nonparametric inference on the causal dose-response function.

Journal of causal inference·2026
Same author

A megastudy of behavioral interventions to promote frequent HIV testing among adults at high risk of HIV infection in Kenya and Uganda: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Trials·2026
Same author

Sequential invitations to FOBT screening and colorectal cancer incidence.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Powering RCTs for Marginal Effects With GLMs Using Prognostic Score Adjustment.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.

Laura B Balzer1, Mark J van der Laan2, Maya L Petersen2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, 02115, MA, U.S.A.. lbbalzer@hsph.harvard.edu.

Statistics in Medicine
|July 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a data-adaptive method to select covariates for analysis in randomized trials, maximizing efficiency and study power. The procedure uses cross-validation to identify the best targeted maximum likelihood estimator (TMLE) for precise inference.

Keywords:
causal inferencecovariate selectiondata-adaptivepair-matchedrandomized trialstargeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE)

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Adjustment for covariates in randomized trials can enhance statistical power and reduce variance.
  • Pre-specification of analysis plans is crucial to prevent misleading inferences.
  • Identifying optimal baseline covariates for adjustment a priori is often challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a rigorous, data-adaptive procedure for selecting adjustment covariates in randomized trials.
  • To maximize the efficiency and power of statistical analyses.
  • To tailor covariate selection to specific scientific questions and study designs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized cross-validation to select candidate targeted maximum likelihood estimators (TMLEs) from a pre-specified library.
  • Developed a collaborative procedure for estimating the exposure mechanism to improve precision.
  • Simulated small sample data to evaluate the proposed methodology.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methodology demonstrated the potential to maximize study power.
  • Nominal confidence interval coverage was maintained.
  • The procedure proved adaptable to different scientific questions and study designs, including pair-matched trials.

Conclusions:

  • The data-adaptive covariate selection procedure offers a rigorous approach to enhance efficiency in randomized trials.
  • This method optimizes statistical power while ensuring reliable inference.
  • The flexibility of the procedure allows for tailored application in diverse research settings, such as the Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health (SEARCH) trial.