Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Competing risks analysis of cause-specific mortality in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma
Esa Läärä1, Jarkko T Korpi2,3,4, Hanna Pitkänen5
1Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Background:
Survival studies on head and neck cancers are frequently reported with inadequate account for competing causes of death. Realistic descriptions and predictions of postdiagnosis mortality should be based on proper competing risks methodology.
Methods:
Prognosis of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in terms of mortality from OSCC and from other causes, respectively, was analyzed according to recent methodological recommendations using cumulative incidence functions and models for cause-specific hazards and subdistribution hazards in 306 patients treated in a tertiary care center in Northern Finland.
Results:
More coherent and informative descriptions and predictions of mortality by cause were obtained with state-of-the-art statistical methods for competing risks than using the prevalent but questionable practice to graph "disease-specific survival."
Conclusion:
From the patients' perspective, proper competing risks analysis offers more relevant prognostic scenarios than naïve analyses of "disease-specific survival"; therefore, it should be used in prognostic studies of head and neck cancers. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Head Neck 39: 56-62, 2017.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

