Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

5.9K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
5.9K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Elaborative Rehearsals01:07

Elaborative Rehearsals

486
Elaborative rehearsal is a crucial cognitive strategy that strengthens information encoding in long-term memory by making meaningful connections between new data and pre-existing knowledge. This approach contrasts with maintenance rehearsal, which involves simple repetition without delving into the significance of the information. While maintenance rehearsal might temporarily keep information active in short-term memory, it is less effective for long-term retention.
The effectiveness of...
486
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.4K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.4K
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

4.0K
Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
4.0K
Hearing01:31

Hearing

58.5K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
58.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acoustic properties of utterance-initial glottal stop in Hawaiian.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Comparing Two Smoothing Approaches in Estimating Kinematic Parameters.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024
Same author

How thresholding in segmentation affects the regression performance of the linear model.

JASA express letters·2023
Same author

Comparison of auto-contouring and hand-contouring of ultrasound images of the tongue surface.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2022
Same author

Spatiotemporal coordination in word-medial stop-lateral and s-stop clusters of American English.

Phonetica·2021
Same author

Effects of phonological features on reading-aloud latencies: A cross-linguistic comparison.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021
Same journal

Unpacking similarity effects in visual memory search: categorical, semantic, and visual contributions.

Journal of memory and language·2026
Same journal

Pausing to breathe and the speech-language relationship in production.

Journal of memory and language·2026
Same journal

Lexical tone is different and special: Evidence from a speeded repeated production task.

Journal of memory and language·2026
Same journal

Listening to disfluent speech: Robust effect at processing may not extend to learning.

Journal of memory and language·2025
Same journal

Close enough isn't good enough in word learning: Successful cross-situational word mappings are semantically independent of previous mappings.

Journal of memory and language·2025
Same journal

Language Control After Phrasal Planning: Playing Whack-a-Mole with Language Switch Costs.

Journal of memory and language·2025
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

3.0K

Perceiving while producing: Modeling the dynamics of phonological planning.

Kevin D Roon1, Adamantios I Gafos2

  • 1The CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7107, New York, NY 10016, USA, +1 (212) 817-8825; Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

Journal of Memory and Language
|July 22, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a dynamical model of phonological planning, explaining how speech production and perception interact in real-time. The model formalizes how perception influences ongoing response planning, supported by evidence from response-distractor tasks.

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

957
Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

17.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

3.0K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

957
Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

17.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Speech production and perception are fundamental cognitive processes.
  • Understanding their real-time interaction is crucial for modeling human communication.
  • Previous models often lack a dynamic framework for online processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a dynamical model of phonological planning.
  • To formally instantiate the interaction between speech production and perception.
  • To account for experimental findings in concurrent speech tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a dynamical model based on the response-distractor task.
  • Formalization of how perception affects ongoing response planning.
  • Utilizing dynamic fields as the key representational unit.

Main Results:

  • The model accounts for a range of results from previous studies.
  • Parameter setting is achieved through the attainment of stable activation distributions.
  • Key properties of representations are derived from the model's dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed dynamical model offers a formal account of speech production-perception interaction.
  • Dynamic fields provide a mechanism for representing and updating phonological information.
  • The model successfully explains how perception influences planning in real-time processing.