Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Novel Protocol for Generating Physiologic Immunogenic Dendritic Cells
Published on: May 17, 2019
Extracorporeal photopheresis practice patterns: An international survey by the ASFA ECP subcommittee
Nancy M Dunbar1, Jay S Raval2, Andrew Johnson3
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Background:
Although many apheresis centers offer extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), little is known about current treatment practices.
Methods:
An electronic survey was distributed to assess ECP practice internationally.
Results:
Of 251 responses, 137 met criteria for analysis. Most respondents were from North America (80%). Nurses perform ECP at most centers (84%) and the majority of centers treat adults only (52%). Most centers treat fewer than 50 patients/year (83%) and perform fewer than 300 procedures/year (70%). Closed system devices (XTS and/or Cellex) are used to perform ECP at most centers (96%). The most common indications for ECP are acute/chronic skin graft versus host disease (89%) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (63%). The typical wait time for ECP treatment is less than 2 weeks (91%). Most centers do not routinely perform quality control assessment of the collected product (66%). There are device-specific differences in treatment parameters. For example, XTS users more frequently have a minimum weight limit (P = 0.003) and use laboratory parameters to determine eligibility for treatment (P = 0.03). Regardless of device used, the majority of centers assess the clinical status of the patient before each procedure. Greater than 50% of respondents would defer treatment for hemodynamic instability due to active sepsis or heart failure, positive blood culture in the past 24 h or current fever.
Conclusion:
This survey based study describes current ECP practices. Further research to provide evidence for optimal standardization of patient qualifications, procedure parameters and product quality assessment is recommended.

