[The choice of stimulation mode in patients with cardioinhibitory or mixed carotid sinus hypersensitivity, with or...

In this prospective study, we evaluated pacing therapy in 60 consecutive patients affected by syncopes or pre-syncopes and cardioinhibitory or mixed carotid sinus hypersensitivity. We preferred DDD/DVI pacing for the 26 patients who had: 1) the cardioinhibitory form and presence of symptomatic pacemaker effect, or 2) the mixed type I form and presence of symptomatic pacemaker effect, ventriculo-atrial conduction, or orthostatic hypotension, or 3) the mixed type II form, or 4) the presence of severe sinus bradycardia. We preferred VVI mode in the other 34 patients. Syncope or pre-syncope persisted in one patient of the VVI group after the pacemaker implant and in one patient of the DDD/DVI group. Therefore, we obtained the suppression of severe symptoms in 97% of cases (58/60 pts). Yet minor symptoms persisted in 35% and 38% of patients of the two groups, respectively. No patient developed clinical signs of cardiac insufficiency or intolerance to pacing therapy. Besides, in DDD/DVI patients, we performed a single-blind, randomized, cross-over study for a comparison between the DDD/DVI and VVI mode: each patient was paced for two months using each mode and for each period symptoms were analyzed. The VVI period, compared to the DDD/DVI, resulted in a significantly higher incidence of symptoms: syncope 8% vs. 0%; pre-syncope 31% vs 0%; minor symptoms 58% vs. 31%; cardiac failure 19% vs. 0%. So the DDD/DVI mode was preferred by 69% of the patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)