Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

598
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
598
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

671
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
671
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

19.0K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
19.0K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

846
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
846

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

What is possible and what is worth: Higher levers afford more work and enhance the value of leisure.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same author

Individual versus collective associative learning in ants.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Testing an increasing social working memory load in the female rat.

Brain research·2025
Same author

Spatially extended instrumental responses are organized in functional bouts.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025
Same author

An Exploration of Individual and Collective Reversal Learning in Rats.

Perspectives on behavior science·2025
Same author

SQAB 2024: Quantitative Frontiers in the Analysis of Behavior.

Perspectives on behavior science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.6K

Interval timing under a behavioral microscope: Dissociating motivational and timing processes in fixed-interval

Carter W Daniels1, Federico Sanabria2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871104, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1104, USA.

Learning & Behavior
|July 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Rats

Keywords:
BoutsComputational modelingFixed-intervalInterval timingMotivationPre-feedingRatsResponse duration

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral neuroscience
  • Animal behavior

Background:

  • Fixed-interval (FI) schedules are fundamental in operant conditioning.
  • Understanding the factors influencing response timing is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how reinforcement schedules and food deprivation affect rat behavior.
  • To model the distributions of latencies and interresponse times (IRTs).

Main Methods:

  • Comparing latencies and IRTs in rats under FI 30s and FI 90s schedules.
  • Utilizing computational modeling with mixture probability distributions and two-state Markov chains.
  • Analyzing the impact of prefeeding on behavioral patterns.

Main Results:

  • Latencies and IRTs are accurately modeled by mixture distributions.
  • Only a subset of latencies is sensitive to reinforcement schedules; prefeeding affects this subset.
  • Interresponse times suggest behavior occurs in bouts that change with reinforcement proximity.
  • Prefeeding alters bout dynamics and inter-bout intervals.
  • Combined models reproduce sigmoidal response functions.

Conclusions:

  • Behavior in FI schedules may fluctuate in and out of schedule control.
  • Timing and motivation appear to be dissociable components of FI performance.
  • Mixture-distribution models offer insights into motivational, associative, and timing processes.
  • Analyzing mean response rates can obscure underlying processes in timing tasks.