Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

05:19
Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
Published on: June 1, 2015
14.1K
Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review
Rebecca Matter1,2, Mark Harniss2, Tone Oderud3
1a School of Public Health and Family Medicine , University of Cape Town , Cape Town , South Africa.
Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology
|July 23, 2016
Summary
Access to assistive technologies (AT) is critically low in low and middle income countries (LMICs). This review highlights the limited and uneven evidence on AT, particularly for hearing, communication, and cognition needs.
Area of Science:
- Rehabilitation science
- Global health equity
- Assistive technology research
Background:
- Access to assistive technologies (AT) is severely limited in low and middle income countries (LMICs), with an estimated 5-15% of those in need receiving them.
- Resource-limited environments face significant challenges in providing essential AT to populations with disabilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive scoping review of the existing evidence base on assistive technologies (AT) within LMICs and other resource-limited settings.
- To identify gaps and trends in AT research to inform future strategies and resource allocation.
Main Methods:
- A systematic scoping review methodology was employed, involving extensive literature searching, data extraction, and synthesis of characteristics from relevant research publications.
- Analysis included categorizing AT types, study designs, and geographical focus of the included studies.
Main Results:
- The review included 252 publications, with over 80% focusing on mobility (45.2%) and vision (35.5%) related AT, primarily spectacles and prosthetics.
- Evidence concerning AT for hearing, communication, and cognition needs was significantly underrepresented.
- The majority of studies (63%) utilized observational designs, indicating a need for more robust research methodologies.
Conclusions:
- The quantity and quality of evidence on AT in resource-limited environments are insufficient and unevenly distributed across AT categories.
- Recommendations include adopting flexible evidence review approaches, establishing a common AT typology and language (e.g., ISO 9999), and significantly increasing research funding.
- Enhanced research is crucial for understanding needs, informing policy, and improving access to appropriate AT for the 80% of the global population with disabilities residing in these areas.

